Notre Dame-UNC End of Game Screens
 

Two borderline screens by ND in final minute of game that went uncalled. Video would be appreciated.

I thought at first glance that the first screen should've been a team control foul and the second one (near division line) was a good no-call.

Time references are needed to pull up video.

The first occurs with about 12 seconds left in the game, and the second occurs on the final possession.

Some of you may be able to browse to the plays (0:11 and 0:05 second half) here: ESPN3 -- Notre Dame vs. North Carolina

video added
 

Here are the plays...

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/PxHz9fcXbZI?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I have nothing on either one.

I don't see anything wrong with either screen.

I have nothing on either one also...seems that the screener was set in plenty of time, and the only movement came from him being run into.

Not only don't I see anything wrong here... I'm questioning the OP on why either of these would be borderline. There's nothing even borderline here. Completely legal. Textbook legal. Put that on the video to show someone how to do it legal.

Those look like really good screens actually. How would those be considered "borderline"? You think his stance is too wide?

I'm with the rest -- I'm not sure how the OP saw the first one as illegal.

Yep, nothing illegal. At first glance I thought his stance was too wide on #1, just wanted to see our thoughts.

Thanks for the video.

My understanding is, that if the stance is wide, but the contact is on the torso, the width of the feet/legs is of no consequence.

No problem with either. Like MD said, put this on a video on how to set legal screens.

Travel? :eek:;)

Seriously, though...the screens are both legal and legal by a long shot.