Verbally counting during a throw-in
Late in a close game, Team A has a backcourt endline throw-in coming out of a timeout. Team B is in a heavy full-court press, and has already been successful at causing a few 5-second throw-in violations earlier in the game.
Thrower A1 asks you to give a verbal count along with your regular arm count. Do you oblige her request? |
No. I think it might state somewhere in one of the books (officials manual or rules book) that the count is "silent and visible". The Coach (or any other player for that matter) can watch the visual count and verbalize if they wish (or request a timeout if the count gets to 4).
|
Only have last year's book with me, but the officals manual, 2.2.2.A.8 (General Throw in Provisions) states:
"The administering official shall begin the five-second count when the ball is at the thrower's disposal. The count is silent and visible" |
Agreed. Do not count out loud.
|
Quote:
|
Never, you are giving the team with the ball an advantage.
Peace |
Do not count out loud. How do you respond if the inbound defender counts out loud? We've got a team here that has adopted it.
After a couple of games where they were warned to stop and tech'd up once, the coach/AD conctacted our assignor. It was determined that as there was no rule preventing them from counting or calling out numbers to indicate/communicate amongst defenders so long as they didn't use their count to argue or incite we had to let it go. When she gets to 5 well before my count she keeps yelling 5 over and over lol. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the counting were to be penalized, it would be for the "how", not the "what", and it would take a lot for me to go this route when it could simply be ignored. And as far as being deceptive ... defenses should be allowed to be deceptive as long as that deception doesn't violate any rules. You wouldn't penalize a team for deceptively yelling out "2-3 zone, 2-3 zone" only to actually play a full court press. Why would any other deceptive verbal communication be any different? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is either being done to try to draw a call from us or to show us up. It's going to get a "Knock it off" from me and a word to the Coach about it asap, and if they keep doing it, it will result in a T being called. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I just can't realistically picture this happening in a manner as extreme as is being suggested. But "technicals" tend to call themselves, and it one is needed in this case, it should be obvious to everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would you allow the defensive players to start counting down early at the end of the quarter? |
Quote:
As an official, I ignore the coach/players count--half of the time its during a series of shots where there is no count anyway :) --and I maintain my own count if its in my PCA. I put this in the category of players calling for "and one" as then run back on defense after a made basket. Ignored 99% of the time. The 1% of the time where it is done in a manner can't be ignored, then it is penalized. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Distraction is fine (ball ball ball), deception of this sort is not part of basketball. It's not gamesmanship. It's bush league, and it's unsporting. It's one thing if the student section is doing it (then it's just bush league), but when the team does it, it's unsporting. In the case of a live ball count, it's either an attempt to influence a call, show up an official, or deceive the offense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Though the rule states the count is silent, does it prevent you from initiating a verbal "one", and a silent count from there, as an indication that you have begun your count?
The logic behind is that not every referee hands the ball off on the baseline the same way and uses the same method to initiate the count. This lets the inbounder know the count has begun. Thoughts? |
Quote:
Otherwise the question becomes if the counting is unsporting behavior. |
Quote:
Quote:
I have to agree with Hokie here, there is not basis for penalizing in this instance. I for one think the counting on the inbounds issue is OK, and to some degree I understand the strategy, but I certainly see the point of others thinking it is unsporting. But for the end of the quarter? Hell half the idiots on the offensive team's bench are doing it by counting too fast anyways. Calling that an unsporting T is fishing for trouble... |
Let Me Do The Counting ...
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess I should have read your post earlier and saved myself the key strokes.:D I couldn't agree more |
Thanks for the responses. Your conversation here basically mimicked the one we had at our last association meeting in regards to it.
Basically it came down to we can't tech them up or ask them to stop because they aren't in violation of any rule. We wouldn't tech up a kid for calling "ball" or players calling out stunts and switches defensively. Their coaches claim is that they communicate timing issues and adjust defensive technique/strategy based on call. We also aren't talking middle school house league here. This is a strong varsity girls team with mutliple presses/stunts they run defensively being coached by a former university coach. If they are doing to it to incite the crowd or question officials we can then respond appropriately. In fairness to the team involved no coach or player has ever question or asked about a 5 second call though I've only done 2-3 of their games. |
I don't care why they say they're doing it, they're not doing it in my game. There's no rule specifically addressing lots of things we deem unsporting, this is no different.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27am. |