The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Arizona/Arizona State Block-Charge (video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/97284-arizona-arizona-state-block-charge-video.html)

JetMetFan Sat Feb 15, 2014 06:04pm

Arizona/Arizona State Block-Charge (video)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump (Post 922922)
If someone is grabbing clips, there's was a block called at about 4:40 remaining in the 2nd half that might generate discussion.

Here's the play...


<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1UL2n9QwBss?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

deecee Sat Feb 15, 2014 06:10pm

If that's not a PC then I don't know what it. the defender is in the path of the offensive player for like 40 feet and backtracking in a straight line. This was coming the whole time.

zm1283 Sat Feb 15, 2014 07:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 923040)
If that's not a PC then I don't know what it. the defender is in the path of the offensive player for like 40 feet and backtracking in a straight line. This was coming the whole time.

Yeah, not really even that close.

AremRed Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:31am

PC foul

Camron Rust Sun Feb 16, 2014 02:55am

That is a PC that could have been called by the guy directing traffic outside the arena.

APG Sun Feb 16, 2014 04:55am

I'm curious to see how plays under NCAA-M rules will be called next year after officials have had a full year to adjust to the rule change. A lot of the plays discussed here would be charges under NBA rules/interpretations which has had the same rule as far as the defender having to have a legal position on the upward motion to shoot or pass the ball.

deecee Sun Feb 16, 2014 09:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by APG (Post 923075)
I'm curious to see how plays under NCAA-M rules will be called next year after officials have had a full year to adjust to the rule change. A lot of the plays discussed here would be charges under NBA rules/interpretations which has had the same rule as far as the defender having to have a legal position on the upward motion to shoot or pass the ball.

I don't see what this video has to do with any confusion around an interpretation or rule modification. I'm pretty sure Naismith would have a PC here as well.

onetime1 Sun Feb 16, 2014 09:41pm

Looks to me as if the offensive player just destroys the defensive player by knocking him to the ground. I would call this a PC foul at every level.

AremRed Sun Feb 16, 2014 09:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by onetime1 (Post 923166)
destroys the defensive player

Is that how you explain it to the coach??

Welpe Sun Feb 16, 2014 09:56pm

Travel.



:D

Toren Mon Feb 17, 2014 01:10am

Even the offensive player knows its a PC. He doesn't even try to make the shot, he looks at the official.

That part was kind of funny.

onetime1 Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 923167)
Is that how you explain it to the coach??

definitely not, I would pull out a copy of this and hand to him explaining Legal Guarding Position.

4-23 Guarding

ART. 4 . . . Guarding an opponent with the ball or a stationary opponent without
the ball:
a. No time or distance is required to obtain an initial legal position.
b. If the opponent with the ball is airborne, the guard must have obtained legal
position before the opponent left the floor.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1