|
Tue Feb 04, 2014, 03:13pm
|
||||
|
||||
|
Frankly, I wouldn't hold it against anyone either way. Aside from the interp, though (which is how old now?), there's no justification for calling this a violation. In fact, the rule is quite clearly the opposite.
It's as if they added an interpretation that stated it was a travel to lift the pivot foot. It's contrary to the rule as written.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Backcourt ruling (NHFS rules) | xxssmen | Basketball | 17 | Wed Mar 14, 2007 01:35pm |
| backcourt ruling during a game question | 81artmonk | Basketball | 3 | Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:22am |
| Backcourt ruling | ditttoo | Basketball | 16 | Sun Jan 23, 2005 06:41pm |
| Ruling? | Scotto | Baseball | 4 | Fri Nov 14, 2003 07:16pm |
| Ruling PLease | sm_bbcoach | Baseball | 5 | Sat Jul 12, 2003 05:41am |
Threaded Mode
