![]() |
Quote:
|
Been There, Done That ...
Quote:
Let's just say that I'm not a big fan of preliminary signals on double whistles, while still realizing that sometimes one official doesn't hear the other's whistle, doesn't realize it's a double whistle, and gives a strong "sell it" preliminary signal. I hate it when that happens. Luckily, the few times that I've been involved in such a situation, my partner, and I, have both had the same signal, there but for the grace of God ... |
Does #34 dark jersey have tights on?
|
I'd like to see the lead close into the players once the illegal hit is delivered. Just being more of a presence on the play.
I'm seeing flagrant/flagrant 2. |
Quote:
Why? One is no more likely to be correct than the other. |
Minimum of INT in Fed and UNS in FIBA - clear path rule. Quite likely upgraded to a DQ.
And if I'm the new L on this play, I want to know why the new T has a call on a breakaway that is my primary. |
Intentional and if I'm the calling official - the L - I immediately go over to the T and ask him his thoughts on giving B1 a flagrant. The fact I'm asking means I'm leaning towards a flagrant.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Edit: Damn JetMet and his edit! :P |
Quote:
|
Player's Answer ...
Quote:
Do you want to pat him down to check? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
0.11 sec lead has foul, and the trail isn't in frame 0.12 sec lead is starting the preliminary signal for Int F 0.13 sec T has made it in frame to table side/3pt line, and is mirroring the preliminary signal for Int F. T freezes and observes players. L comes in and is observing players in lane. We can debate whether it was int or flag all day, but I think they handled the situation appropriately. I don't have an issue with the double whistle, or the T coming in and mirroring the L call. Unless the T was doing something out of frame we are not privy to this is a good crew call. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43am. |