Good question from young ref

[Camron Rust]

Originally posted by Barry C. Morris

I especially hate those redundancies that repeat themselves. I prefer the lone, single, all by themself, isolated, non-repetitive redundancy. [/B]

Speaking of that, do you know where the closest ATM Machine is?

[Edited by Camron Rust on Aug 14th, 2003 at 12:35 PM]

[Andy]

Originally posted by Barry C. Morris

I especially hate those redundancies that repeat themselves. I prefer the lone, single, all by themself, isolated, non-repetitive redundancy. [/B]

This quote sponsored and brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department!

[Andy]

Originally posted by Camron Rust

Speaking of that, do you know where the closest ATM Machine is? [/B]

While you are there, will you use your PIN number?

[DownTownTonyBrown]

Originally posted by Andy

While you are there, will you use your PIN number? [/B]

Irregardless of whether you had known where the ATM was before we started this conversation, do you know your PIN number?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally posted by DownTownTonyBrown

Irregardless of whether you had known where the ATM was before we started this conversation, do you know your PIN number? [/B][/QUOTE]Let me reiterate the above.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally posted by Larks
For those wondering.....

battologist

\Bat*tol"o*gist\, n. One who battologizes.

Glad I could help.

Thank you for your usual pithy response, Mr. Larkths.

[jking_94577]

What happens if B1 has fallen down and his shorts are on OOB line? Then A1 who is inbounds steps on shorts of B1? Is the shorts an object or part of the player?

Ok and now for the non serious part if the shorts are part of the player? What happens in the case where A1 steps on the shoe of B1. The shoe comes off B1 but A1 is still on the shoe and the shoe is touching OOB.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Thank you for your usual pithy response, Mr. Larkths.

Sounds like someone owes someone a battology.

[rainmaker]

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

I know what it means, and from whence it is derived.

I just don't think the word has a hyphen in it.
[/B]

Well,you're one up on me, Bob. I hadda go look the word up to find out where it actually came from.

As for the hyphen, I have the utmost confidence that Juulie will post something that will back up her usage of it. I am also confident that I probably won't understand her post when she does so. [/B][/QUOTE]

It was a typo...

No wait... I put in the hyphen in, because I figured no one would understand if I didn't. Yea, that's it, you're all a bunch of cretins...

No wait, that's not nice. Okay, uh, let's see...

oh, yeah, hyphenating the non-syllabic glottal stop is recommended when the speech sounds are more evocative than the air flow of the scintvillication parabola.

Take that Dexter, you greenhorn!!

[mick]

Admit it, Jewel, that the hyphen was added because we are dashing.

[Mark Dexter]

Originally posted by Camron Rust

Speaking of that, do you know where the closest ATM Machine is?

[Edited by Camron Rust on Aug 14th, 2003 at 12:35 PM]

Yes, but you'll never guess my PIN number!

[rainmaker]

Originally posted by mick
Admit it, Jewel, that the hyphen was added because we are dashing.

Ha, ha, good joke!!

[dblref]

Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Avoid superfluous, repetative, redundancies like the plague!

Actually Mr. Dexter, it is "repetitive", not "repatitive".

Your welcome, Juulie!

[Barry C. Morris]

Originally posted by dblref

Your welcome, Juulie!
[/B]

Oh My! I think we're baiting the Grammar Police.

[cmathews]

ok now I am confused....whos welcome is it anyway???