You Decide - Block, Charge or Travel (Clip)
 

You Decide - block, charge or travel for high school game?

Traveling? - YouTube

remember...
 

"Embed" is your friend...

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/zf4ppGoMZWU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Man, I never want to be THAT partner. Lead had the defensive foul (correct call IMO), and this guy comes in and says I don't care what you have, here's what I have, BANG!

1) This is a charge.

2) The blond haired Ron Burgundy needs to replace his gray shoes with black shoes.

3) Ron Burgundy needs to worry about his PAC and not his partner's PAC.

MTD, Sr.

I think block is the correct call as well. From this camera angle, it is hard to tell exactly when the player ended their dribble. Not sure how the official that called the travel saw that clearly either.

I doubt that is what he is thinking. I don't even think a conversation is necessary here. If you are calling a travel, it is pretty obvious that the travel had to have occurred before any contact was made. Therefore, it doesn't matter whether the other official had block or charge.

I do agree, that he is fishing outside of his primary though on a play that he doesn't have an ideal look.

I think the girl travelled twice (once before the dribble and once after), but it's hard to tell. If it wasn't a travel, then I agree that charge is more likely than block.

Since the play started in the T's Area (I'm assuming this is two person), I have no problem with T making a call.

Not a great angle but I'm calling a block here

That old warhorse needs a tongue lashing at the end of the half. Grey shoes look like crap. Wristwatch looks like crap. He reached WAYYY across and called an inconclusive travel that he couldn't have possibly seen clearly...then waved his partenr off after he made a good call dead in his lap. I don't care how new or inexperienced the partner is, this guy looks horrible.

• Stay in your primary.
• Trust your partner.
• Look the part.

I'm scratching this goober before my next game.

Based on this angle I have a no-call (and thus OOB white). No way partner should be overruling here, he had no whistle and didn't have his arm up. Looks like he just decided after the foul to go back and get a phantom travel.

First of all, I have no problem if a partner has a violation before a foul. That can happen from time to time in a game and really happens in 2 person games. I am just not in favor of the body language of the officials and that includes both of them. If I have a call he is going to have to do a little more to talk me off of it than a "wave off" that was shown by the Trail here. And I have as much problem with the lead going to get the ball, turning his back on the players as I do with the body language of the Trail. The ball is not going anywhere.

Peace

He gives his partner a stop sign 3 times and doesn't consult with him at all. It just looks bad. If I'm the lead, I'm taking his gestures as "I got your foul for you", so I would let him report it. Which is what looks like what happened here. L lets his partner take the call, and then sees he got overruled, and at that point you have to go with the call. But if I'm lead, I'm having a conversation with that guy later.

I can buy a no-call...but there's no way the contact in that play warrants a charge call.

Don't work much 2 man....

If he is T rather than C on this play why is he where he is?

Wow, that is just bad.

As rare as it is, I agree with Rut's post on this one.

This is either a block (not likely) or just an OOB call. (More likely if it's me)