The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   backcourt on a thrown in (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/96315-backcourt-thrown.html)

constable Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:36pm

backcourt on a thrown in
 
I apologize if this has been covered before.

Here's the situation.

A1 throw in. A2 tries to grab the throw in but can only tip it while standing in front court.

A3 then collects the ball in the back court.

Violation or no?

AremRed Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by constable (Post 907900)
I apologize if this has been covered before.

Here's the situation.

A1 throw in. A2 tries to grab the throw in but can only tip it while standing in front court.

A3 then collects the ball in the back court.

Violation or no?

No, team control must be established in the front court before a back court violation can occur. Tip =/= team control

kjk5 Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:59pm

AremRed is correct, No violation.

AremRed Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:04am

This video isn't great, but shows what we are talking about. MSU player receives the throw in and fumbles it into the back court. Bo Boroski calls the violation. Eventually Mike Kitts comes over and discusses it with him (with bonus Ted Valentine!).

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/2i__h5I4eHU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Camron Rust Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 907905)
This video isn't great, but shows what we are talking about. MSU player receives the throw in and fumbles it into the back court. Bo Boroski calls the violation. Eventually Mike Kitts comes over and discusses it with him (with bonus Ted Valentine!).

Prefect example of the play....and that some of the big dogs don't really know the rules all that well (but Coach Izzo knew it).

AremRed Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 907907)
some of the big dogs don't really know the rules all that well (but Coach Izzo knew it).

Ah, I just think he was too close to the play. Probably looking at the feet for out of bounds and missed the fumble.

Camron Rust Fri Oct 18, 2013 01:27am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 907909)
Ah, I just think he was too close to the play. Probably looking at the feet for out of bounds and missed the fumble.

If you insist...but I see it missed more than would be explained by that.

Adam Fri Oct 18, 2013 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by camron rust (Post 907912)
if you insist...but i see it missed more than would be explained by that.

+1

And it's going to get worse with time, I think, as the rule stays the same and the powerpoints fade into the veterans' memory. Eventually, the NFHS will decide to just issue a case play making this a violation. After all, everyone is already calling it that way.

Sharpshooternes Fri Oct 18, 2013 09:20am

The black official's box out on the coach was hilarious!!!:D:D:D He didn't even have an illegal use of hands. Bwahahahah!!:D

billyu2 Fri Oct 18, 2013 08:54pm

definition: fumble 4-21
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 907909)
Ah, I just think he was too close to the play. Probably looking at the feet for out of bounds and missed the fumble.

AremRed, if it was a fumble (by definition) then it would be a violation, right?
Perhaps "muffed or bobbled" would be a better word.

BktBallRef Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by billyu2 (Post 908033)
aremred, if it was a fumble (by definition) then it would be a violation, right?
Perhaps "muffed or bobbled" would be a better word.

+1

johnny d Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:32pm

I have always been under the impression, from watching him on tv and hearing him speak at numerous camps, that Boroski is a pretty solid rules guy. I would have liked to hear the conversation that made him change his mind on this call because I think an argument can be made that the MSU player controlled the ball in the front court. He had 2 hands on the ball before he dropped it and it went into the backcourt.

constable Sat Oct 19, 2013 05:26pm

Thanks all. It'd be helpful if the NFHS book actually stated when team control inbounds starts on a throw in.

HokiePaul Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:41am

Maybe sort of off-topic, but is there such a thing as a controlled tip that would count as team control. So for example, lets say that the throw in from A1 is off target and heading out of bounds untouched. A2, in the front court "saves" the ball from going out of bounds by intentionally tapping it to A3 who is in the back court. Could this be considered team control by A2 (and thus a backcourt violation when touched by A3) if it was clear that the tap was a controlled pass?

APG Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:54am

Team control, for the purposes of backcourt or 3 second violations, is established at the same time as player control...by holding or dribbling a live ball inbounds. A tip, no matter how controlled, is not either of those.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1