The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 08:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Are questions 40 and 44 supposed to be identical?
Don't know if they're supposed to be but they are.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 197
I will double check that also. I got the questions and answers from an officials association web site. I have last years test at home and I will double check that also.

Thanks
__________________
R.Vietti
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 10:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Well, you tell me if they missed them.

If a player is blocked OOB by an opponent, he may at the first opportunity come back inbounds and legally participate.

If a kick becomes dead in R's end zone, it is always a touchback.

Whatcha think?
My take on these 2 questions are that the answers are correct but they are in the usual Fed confusion

The first question is almost a direct quote from the rule book with the exception of using may instead of shall.
Answer True.

The second question about the kick is False because the rule refers to scrimmage kicks or free kicks that are not scoring attempts.
I guess the trick to that question is that a 'try' would not be a touchback under any circumstance, but it is still a scrimmage kick.
__________________
R.Vietti
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 10:55am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,478
Wink Surprise...........

Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef

Rick, that's the last place you should ever go for answers to an NFHS exam!
I have been saying this for years. Our state throws out 2-3 questions on every single test, in every single sport I officiate. But I guess we all need a test to prove our ability on the court?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 12:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Re: Surprise...........

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef

Rick, that's the last place you should ever go for answers to an NFHS exam!
I have been saying this for years. Our state throws out 2-3 questions on every single test, in every single sport I officiate. But I guess we all need a test to prove our ability on the court?

Peace
No, you've been saying that passing an exam does not make one a great official. And no one disagrees with that. however, this has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is simply another case where the Fed made typographical errors on the answer key. It's simply a indication that they make mistakes.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 08, 2003, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Rick Vietti
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Well, you tell me if they missed them.

If a player is blocked OOB by an opponent, he may at the first opportunity come back inbounds and legally participate.

If a kick becomes dead in R's end zone, it is always a touchback.

Whatcha think?
My take on these 2 questions are that the answers are correct but they are in the usual Fed confusion

The first question is almost a direct quote from the rule book with the exception of using may instead of shall.
Answer True.

The second question about the kick is False because the rule refers to scrimmage kicks or free kicks that are not scoring attempts.
I guess the trick to that question is that a 'try' would not be a touchback under any circumstance, but it is still a scrimmage kick.
The first question is defintely True, but the Fed has it as False. The second question, I'm not sure what they're looking for here. They have it as False and what you point out about the try is correct. But it doesn't seem to fit the question or the reference that they offered.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 11, 2003, 02:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge


I have been saying this for years. Our state throws out 2-3 questions on every single test, in every single sport I officiate. But I guess we all need a test to prove our ability on the court?

Peace
Rut,
I think we need a test to prove that the officials study and know the rules. That's all.
Nothing is worse than working with a partner who screws up the game with a call or two because he doesn't know the correct rule.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1