Video Request: WSU vs OSU (Video Added)
 

7:03 in the second half.

OSU player is called for a block (in the restricted area) but I am wondering if it would be a charge anywhere else on the court? They show two good replays.

Peace

About 4:02 on the clock there is an out of bounds play that it appears the thrower does not get back in bounds when the ball is passed back to him form WSU. Replay shows he might have gotten his heel up when he contacts the ball.

Peace

ohio st-Wichita St
 

Clip please Jetmetfan:

3:01 of 2nd half..Player Control foul

Thanks!

2nd half: PC at 18:40

Saw it live. If it's the one I'm thinking of, the ball handler definitely made it easy for the calling official. He stiff armed the defender who gave a pretty good performance throwing himself backward. Embellished by the defender...but still a good call.

I wish I remember when this play happened, but hopefully someone else will. An OSU player got called for a PC, and he got the WSU player pretty good on the chin with his elbow on the way up. They went to the monitor and came back with nothing. With some of the other elbows that have gotten called in the tournament (I don't remember what game it was, but the player who got a FF1 who was past his defender, but accidentally hit him with his arm as he was running by) I thought it could have been a FF1. It looked to me like it fit non-excessive elbow contact above the shoulders, but I am curious to hear what some other guys think.

It looked to me like a PC if his feet weren't on the line.

Wichita State-Ohio State clips
 

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/H8d7JrEqB0U?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wNklwVLkrKw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/x9QUdzcPFOU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6WBzkezVoZA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I have a block.
 

Defender moved into the path of airborne shooter.

At 3:01...I stand corrected...more of an offensive arm bar than a stiff arm. Still, a good call I think.

No chance. The shooter wasn't airborne and the defender had two feet down in the spot where he took the contact. Without the RA, I have a charge.

I see his feet there before the player went airborne. I would have a charge in a HS game on this one and college one if not for the RA.

Now do you want to debate this when the still picture is shown and I am proven right and you are proven wrong? (Yes that is sarcasm) :D

Peace

By all accounts it look like he got the out of bounds correct as well.

They showed a replay but it was close and this was slowed down and I am more confident that this was correct. I guess the only issue is was the heel off the floor, but he is standing right there.

Peace

PC1: 2nd:18:30....if they were consistent with the other applications of the elbow/FF1 rule that we've seen, this would have been a FF1. I don't like that conclusion and actually prefer it as they called it...but it was not consistent.

RA Block @ 2nd:7:30. PC...he gained LGP outside of RA and moved to maintain it and ended up on the RA. If you only look where he is at the time of contact, you'd have an RA block. However, the RA rules are based on initial LGP, not position at the time of contact. His final position was also obtained before the shooter left the floor.

EDIT: More on this one...at about 15.5 seconds into the slow-mo replay, you can see that the defender is facing the dribbler, both feet on the floor (defender's shoes have the red trim, offense shoes are all black), and the dribbler is coming right at him (in the dribbler's path) and the defender is about 1 foot outside the RA. LGP obtained. At about 16 seconds on the slo-mo, he stepped to the right to maintain LGP but stepped into the RA with his right foot, he then slid his left foot in to a point also in the RA. Then the shooter left the floor. LGP Maintained.

OOB @ 2nd:4:02... inconclusive. #22's head was blocking what needed to be seen in the first angle and the other angle really didn't show it clearly enough either.

PC @ 2nd:3:01. A bit of exaggeration. Contact, yes, a bit of a arm sweep, yes. But it was not nearly enough to have caused #3 to get knocked to the floor. I'd not call it for that reason alone. #3 took himself out of the play more then he got pushed out of the play.

Toes down.
 

But from this angle....
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vW797v1uUDE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

OK, but he has both feet on the floor and his right foot never moved over in the direction the shooter was jumping before he left the floor. You have to do a little bit more than that to say he was not in a LGP IMO. And he would have likely taken the contact in the torso either way.

Peace

Agreed.

Didn't see it but since they already called a foul maybe they didn't feel the need to upgrade. On the other plays you are referencing there were no fouls originally called. Once they went to the monitor they could only come back with either nothing or some type of flagrant.

Offensive foul elbow: I agree with how the officials made this call. It was a PC foul, but the elbow was clearly as part of a move for the shot. This should not have been a FF1, but is an issue with consistency of the calls.

RA Block on OSU: I personally think the OSU defender was moving to the right as the shooter went up in the air. Now the question is, was he pushed to the left by the post player in the first place? I think this was a good call by the officials.

WSU PC Foul: This was the most obvious of all of them for me. The WSU player and the OSU defender were going in the same direction and the WSU player leaned into the OSU player and extended the arm into him. No Brainer in my opinion.

Out of bounds call: I see two potential issues on this play. One, does he have the left foot inbounds prior to touching the ball? I don't think he does, which means he has never established any position inbounds when he caught the ball. I think this is what the official calls, because it does look like the heel is up prior to him catching the ball. I think everyone focused on the rear foot they forgot to look at the front foot which never came down before he caught the ball. This seems pretty clear on the view from behind the play, not as clear on the main camera view.

If you look at the last angle they show, it sure looks like the players foot has not touched down prior to him catching the pass. Since he has not touched down at all in the court he has never established legal floor position, thus the violation.

You need legal guarding position on this play...to catch a pass from a teamamte? I guess i need to reread my rulebook. :eek:

His forward foot is not in question. It is certainly in the air. The question is his rear foot. It was on the floor but was it inbounds or out? That is what is inconclusive on these replays. If in, legal. If out, illegal.

EDIT: I've now gone back and read your other post. Methinks you might want to reread the section of the rulebook where it defines player location. If you're calling plays like you describe above, you're not getting them correct. Simply put, you are where you are touching. Period. If you're touching two areas at once there is a priority to determine which area you're in. There is no 2-feet down requirement as far as player location goes (with one exception and it isn't related to this discussion.)

I never said there was a 2 feet down requirement. What I said is that the angle that you need to look at is that back angle. Three things need to be looked at. When does he touch the ball. Where is the left foot when he touches the ball, and then where is the right foot. In my opinion, when he touches the ball the left (front foot), has not touched down yet when he touches the ball. This means this foot could not be used to establish position on the floor, since the last position it was touching was OOB. The next issue is the rear foot. Only after looking at the first two does this really matter. I have to give the official the benefit of the doubt on this as he was right there when the call was made.

I can see where you think I mean the 2 foot down rule was implied. It isn't. I was simply stating that the front foot has never established any position on the play which was the impression I got that others were saying.

I don't have a problem with either RA play.

The OOB play bothers me because the Trail was right on top of that, but we see obvious travels no-called all the time. I know there's a difference, but if we're going to call this OOB violation, call more travels.

The PC foul on WSU with the elbow was a flop. I would no-call it because the OSU player took a dive.

And out of bounds call does not take in the multiple factors that a travel might or even PC foul you described as a flop. Out of bounds calls with someone stepping on the line are a little more obvious and always will be.

Peace