![]() |
|
|||
Let's see here - the following original "Big 8+4" teams are IN:
Colorado Missouri K State Kansas Iowa St Okie St OU and these are OUT: Texas aTm TCU Baylor ![]() Too bad Nebraska couldn't find their way into the Dance to make this illustration even sweeter. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. |
|
|||
In all of my brackets I have Louisville. Then I listened to half an hour of a rant no ESPN about how Louisville has the toughest road and there's no way they get there --- I am now more confident in my pick.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?' West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
"Nothing to report here. Move along."
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?' West Houston Mike |
|
|||
![]()
The odds of you filling out a perfect bracket this year are a staggering 1 in 9.2 quintillion. That's a nine with 18 zeroes or 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 if you're not into the whole rounding thing.
How big is that? That's one billion, 9.2 billion times. It's 500,000 times more than our $17 trillion national debt. You'd have a better chance of hitting four holes-in-one in a single round of golf. The 1 in 9.2 quintillion number is straight mathematics. It figures out how many possible ways the 63 game results on your bracket could be filled out. (Two to the sixty-third power.)
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. |
|
|||
Quote:
The assumption there is that each game has exactly a 50% chance of hitting either result. But that's not true at all. Take the 1-seed vs 16-seed games as the extreme example. I suppose the chance of a 1 seed losing is not exactly zero, but it's damn close. Take as a given (near 100%) that the picker will pick 4 1-seeds to win, and 4 1-seeds do actually win, your odds of a perfect bracket become 16 times greater ... a mere 576.46 quadrillion to 1. For each set of matchups, the odds are not 50-50, and for each of those that are not, if you also assume that the picking people mirror somewhat the actual odds (and not 50-50), the odds of the overall package improve. (For an example of that, consider 4 games with 75% odds, say, 4 4-13 matchups: The odds of getting these 4 correct are not 1 in 2^4 (1/16 = 6.25%) but rather 15.2587891%. 2.44 times greater than expected. Those 4 games change the overall odds to (just) 236.25 quadrillion.) Do that for each round of matchups, and the odds of a perfect bracket are actually MUCH greater than 9 quintillion.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?' West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Just did the napkin math on just the first round (2nd is more complicated as I can't just assume 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, etc - but have to go by the same percentages I calc'd for each upset in the first round).
I used the following odds: 1 vs 16 = 99.99% 2 vs 15 = 96% 3 vs 14 = 92% 4 vs 13 = 85% 5 vs 12 = 72% (I was tempted to say 50/50 given the oddities we've seen on these over the years) 6 vs 11 = 66% 7 vs 10 = 60% 8 vs 9 = 53% You are 27,574 times more likely to get a perfect bracket than what was posted above. (I'll work on adding the other rounds, but it's more than napkin math) Or 334 trillion to 1.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?' West Houston Mike |
|
|||
MD - what are the odds of Robert Morris beating Ky in round one of the NIT?
![]() Anyone see the flagrant 2 w/ 3:41 left in the game? Yikes.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. |
|
|||
[QUOTE=MD Longhorn;885403]I've seen this math before, and honestly, it's quite inflated. Statistics classes in me coming back to mind...
The assumption there is that each game has exactly a 50% chance of hitting either result. But that's not true at all. Take the 1-seed vs 16-seed games as the extreme example. I suppose the chance of a 1 seed losing is not exactly zero, but it's damn close. Take as a given (near 100%) that the picker will pick 4 1-seeds to win, and 4 1-seeds do actually win, your odds of a perfect bracket become 16 times greater ... a mere 576.46 quadrillion to 1. For each set of matchups, the odds are not 50-50, and for each of those that are not, if you also assume that the picking people mirror somewhat the actual odds (and not 50-50), the odds of the overall package improve. (For an example of that, consider 4 games with 75% odds, say, 4 4-13 matchups: The odds of getting these 4 correct are not 1 in 2^4 (1/16 = 6.25%) but rather 15.2587891%. 2.44 times greater than expected. Those 4 games change the overall odds to (just) 236.25 quadrillion.) Do that for each round of matchups, and the odds of a perfect bracket are actually MUCH greater than 9 quintillion.[/QUOTE] Senator Everett Dirksen would have been proud.
__________________
Never hit a piρata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
|
|||
Quote:
Does anyone have a video link? |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Baby Needs A New Pair Of Zigs ...
I'm in. Go Cardinals.
Who do I send my money to? Mark Padgett? Also. How does one pronounce the capital of Kentucky? "Louis-ville", or "Louie-ville"?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) I was in prison and you came to visit me. (Matthew 25:36) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ESPN TOurnament Challenge | 26 Year Gap | Basketball | 163 | Tue Apr 05, 2011 07:57am |
espn tournament challenge | 26 Year Gap | Basketball | 214 | Mon Apr 05, 2010 01:00pm |
ESPN Tournament Challenge | BktBallRef | Basketball | 80 | Tue Apr 07, 2009 04:13pm |
ESPN Tournament Challenge | BktBallRef | Basketball | 97 | Mon Apr 03, 2006 05:52pm |
ESPN Men's Tournament Challenge | BktBallRef | Basketball | 42 | Thu Mar 18, 2004 04:15pm |