The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   The 3-person battle continues (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/93620-3-person-battle-continues.html)

just another ref Tue Jan 22, 2013 04:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 873673)
I don't think anyone is advocating it...but like tome gun said, there are dead spots in two man coverage and coaches take advantage of that knowledge.

There are dead spots in the paint when large numbers of bodies are packed in there at times, so let's go nuts when that happens, guys.

I find the whole concept dirty.

Raymond Tue Jan 22, 2013 04:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 873681)
There are dead spots in the paint when large numbers of bodies are packed in there at times, so let's go nuts when that happens, guys.

I find the whole concept dirty.

And far be it from a coach or player to do anything dirty.

just another ref Tue Jan 22, 2013 04:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 873688)
And far be it from a coach or player to do anything dirty.

Right. We should get this line published somewhere.

bowlingref Tue Jan 22, 2013 04:54pm

We get $ 5.00 extra for working a varsity girls game with two people. Two private schools are the only ones that do this. One of the coaches got on me about a non call the other night and my reply was, tell your A/D that is what he gets for not coming off the extra $$$$$ to have 3 refs on the floor.

just another ref Tue Jan 22, 2013 05:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowlingref (Post 873698)
We get $ 5.00 extra for working a varsity girls game with two people. Two private schools are the only ones that do this. One of the coaches got on me about a non call the other night and my reply was, tell your A/D that is what he gets for not coming off the extra $$$$$ to have 3 refs on the floor.

Objection.......argumentative

I wouldn't get into the habit of saying this to a coach.

jmo

bob jenkins Tue Jan 22, 2013 05:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 873673)
I don't think anyone is advocating it...but like tome gun said, there are dead spots in two man coverage and coaches take advantage of that knowledge.

It's not only specific spots, it's general coverage.

If all fouls were seen with 3 officials, then maybe only 2/3 of the fouls are seen with 2 officials. So, "play more agressive" and you'll be able to commit 7 fouls before you get called for 5.

(The math and logic isn't quite right, of course, but the general concept is.0

rockyroad Tue Jan 22, 2013 05:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 873700)
It's not only specific spots, it's general coverage.

If all fouls were seen with 3 officials, then maybe only 2/3 of the fouls are seen with 2 officials. So, "play more agressive" and you'll be able to commit 7 fouls before you get called for 5.

(The math and logic isn't quite right, of course, but the general concept is.0

Easy now Bob...you are just being dirty now. :rolleyes:

just another ref Tue Jan 22, 2013 05:28pm

For the coaches benefit, (can't believe I said that) putting any faith in a blanket concept such as this one has large potential to break your heart. Depending on a variety of factors, this 2 man crew, may call more/tighter and yes, possibly even a better game overall than that 3 man crew.

rockyroad Tue Jan 22, 2013 06:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 873703)
For the coaches benefit, (can't believe I said that) putting any faith in a blanket concept such as this one has large potential to break your heart. Depending on a variety of factors, this 2 man crew, may call more/tighter and yes, possibly even a better game overall than that 3 man crew.

Of course.

And then the coaches and players adjust.

packersowner Tue Jan 22, 2013 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by egj13 (Post 873625)
We do all our Varsity games here in MT with 3-man. In some of the tiny gyms it is almost too many people out there but we do it anyway.

Last year I was doing a JV game in 2-man. The H coach was asking me to watch off ball screens so I said "I'll watch what I can and that is why we have 3 refs at the varsity level to catch that stuff easier". He looks at me and says "all having 3 refs does is make you all lazy. You had 2 refs for all those years and were just fine, now you all are lazy" :rolleyes: I swear...


Well the game was much simpler when Custer County beat Missoula, 11-6, circa 1923. :D

BktBallRef Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 873621)
There was a study done by one of the eastern states ( one of the Carolinas I think) that showed that the first year of three person crews, the number of fouls called on average per game went up. In years 2 and 3, the average went down. They attributed it to two things: 1) the coaches and players cleaned it up knowing they could not get away with stuff away from the ball; and 2) the number of " marginal" calls - ones where we didnt have a good luck at the play but called something based on a partial look - went way, way down. The number of calls considered correct went way up.


I don't think it was us. We've been using 3 man for all varsity games for over 20 years. It's mandated by the NCHSAA.

Our local also works 3 man for all JV games in the one 3A and two 4A conferences that we work. How else can you prepare officials to work varsity?

packersowner Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 873739)
Our local also works 3 man for all JV games

+1

These are some the hardest games to work with two.

JetMetFan Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:53am

Life in the big city...
 
I had a public school AD tell me a couple of weeks ago he's going to push for 3-person crews. NYC only does 3-person in the regular season for AA Varsity in Catholic and Private schools, not public (AA is the highest level of ball in NYC/NYS) and his school is AA public. He said he can't see how we call that level of ball with only two people.

My BV assigner suggested to us a few years ago that we should go 3-person in exchange for a cut in pay to help schools deal with the cost. We're at $105 for 2-person. He said we should go $75 for 3-person, meaning it would only cost the schools $15 for the third, the fees would eventually go back up and more people would get Varsity work. Overwhelming majority of officials said no way. I thought - and still think - the folks who said no were nuts.

NYC publics go 3-person starting with the city QF at all levels (AA, A & B). A few years ago NYS actually went back to 2-person crews for the state semis and finals. The organizers said they were having trouble finding enough officials who understood how to work 3-person so they went back to two. It's back to three again.

bowlingref Wed Jan 23, 2013 02:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 873699)
Objection.......argumentative

I wouldn't get into the habit of saying this to a coach.

jmo

I am friends with the A/D at that school and he refs with us some. I would not say that to just any coach. If the A/D rides with me to a game, we ususally have a chat about the $$$ he is savign by using two man crews.

Raymond Wed Jan 23, 2013 08:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 873650)
Which Irvin brother was causing the problems in that game? :D

Peace

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 873654)
I had to deal with one of their assistants one time. He looked shocked that I called him out and spoke in such an authoritative/combative tone. :cool:

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 873655)
Perspective is not that program's best suit. And the fact that many of the people involved coach programs at the high school level coaching and some situations in some recent incidents, their reputation certainly is well known. That is all I will say.

Peace

So, did I just read about a suspension that is applicable to this conversation?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1