The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   T or no T? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/93502-t-no-t.html)

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:17pm

T or no T?
 
Details:
I'm a 3rd year guy...
Last night's game is a boys JV and I'm the R...
Our state association says that in order for a player to wear a compression sleeve he/she must have an approval letter from on the association letterhead.
During captain's meeting V12 asks if he can wear his because he's got a cut and produces a doctor's note, I say no and suggest he get the trainer to wrap him up. He goes to his coach who comes out to mid-court to make his case. I say the same thing I said to the player, that without an approval letter on state association letter he can't wear it.
Coach: "All the other refs said he can wear it, even the varsity refs."
Me: "I understand that but if he doesn't have the letter he can't wear it."
Coach: "Are you a varsity ref?"
Me: "No."
Coach gives me what I felt was the "I thought so" look and walks away.

The game starts and it's a competitive game and both sides are pretty aggressive. V kids are pretty mouthy. For example they yell "And one!" (my personal pet peeve) and after the second time we warn that we won't put up with that anymore. Additionally we're getting a lot of "Traveling!" from their bench. Another warning of "No more of that." For the most part they respond. We had a drive to the basket and a kid starts to yell "And one." but stops halfway through his "one." :)

Sure enough there's a rebound and V54 grabs it, swings his elbow and makes contact with the opponent's head. I've got it all the way and call the POE intentional. I report and then turn to answer the coach's question.

Coach: "What did he do?!" He's a couple of steps on the floor, arms out, quite animated.
Me: "He made contact above the shoulders with his elbow. That's an intentional this year."
Coach: "That's not an intentional! No way!"
Coach to my partner (before I can get out of there and administer): "You gotta help him out here."
Me: Whack.

At the half my evaluator told me he didn't like the T, saying that I've gotta let the coach vent a little.
I felt disrespected by the coach...

Thoughts?

rockyroad Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:22pm

First thought: Nice job by you.

Second thought: You need to find yourself a different evaluator!

Raymond Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:22pm

For what reason are you supposed to let a coach vent?

I've been told that if we blow a call that we have to be willing to catch a little flak from a coach. But your situation does not fall in that category.

I called a T on a kid a few weeks ago for throwing ball at an opponent after a made basket. Coach tried to ask me about it as I was going towards the table to report it and I simply told the coach "this is not up for discussion".

rekent Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:24pm

I don't see a problem with it. Coach can vent without trying to show you up and openly questioning your competence.

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 871855)
...I simply told the coach "this is not up for discussion".

This is definitely going into the quiver! :cool: Thanks.

JRutledge Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:28pm

I am not a big fan of "And 1" either, but I just ignore it. It just makes me not call a foul especially when there is hardly any contact or the contact is not a foul.

That being said, unless the coach was jumping up and down or going crazy with his arms, I probably would need a little more to call a T.

I also would not say anything about "That is intentional this year." The problem with the POE is they did not change the rule. Just tell the coach you had an intentional foul and it was for the contact above the shoulders and then it will be a lesser debate IMO. I think you want to tell him it was your judgement instead of getting into it being a rules change (because it actually is not a rules change, whether we like it or not).

I am only going to side with the evaluator if he saw the play or reaction. You are going to get oppositions to plays like that, just go explain it to them quietly and move on. Now if the coach cursed or got personal in that exchange then OK, I can go along with that. But it does not sound like anything the coach did was over the top. You have to sometimes learn that they will complain and what is acceptable by most.

Peace

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 871854)
First thought: Nice job by you.

Thanks, this is important to me. (Not that I'm after pats on the back... :))
.

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 08:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 871859)

I also would not say anything about "That is intentional this year." The problem with the POE is they did not change the rule.

Great point.

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 871859)
I am only going to side with the evaluator if he saw the play or reaction.

He saw both.

JRutledge Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rooster (Post 871863)
He saw both.

I meant to say "and."

Peace

ODog Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:06pm

I think it'd be all right if you said, "It's a point of emphasis this year." So that way, when he goes *****ing to one of his friends on your board and quotes you on that -- as long as your fellow member isn't a complete hack/apologist -- he can say, "Well he IS right about that, Leroy."

I ALWAYS mention the contact-above-the-shoulder thing during the captains' meeting. Doesn't do much for the coaches or most of the players, but that's all you've got ... I think.

BktBallRef Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rooster (Post 871853)
Coach: "What did he do?!" He's a couple of steps on the floor, arms out, quite animated.
Me: "He made contact above the shoulders with his elbow. That's an intentional this year."
Coach: "That's not an intentional! No way!"
Coach to my partner (before I can get out of there and administer): "You gotta help him out here."
Me: Whack.

I don't think he said anything that deserves a T.

Where he was or how animated he was might be the greater issue for me.

JRutledge Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ODog (Post 871865)
I ALWAYS mention the contact-above-the-shoulder thing during the captains' meeting. Doesn't do much for the coaches or most of the players, but that's all you've got ... I think.

I think the more you mention stuff, the more they want you to call something that might not be there. Why bring that to their attention. I would only say something that your area (and that could be the case here) is making sure everyone is enforcing and mostly administrative issues that have nothing to do with actual play calling. It would be like saying, "We are going to address handchecking" and the first act that looks like handchecking you are going to be seen as not doing what you suggested.

Not saying I am right, I just think you open yourself up the more you talk in that meeting.

Peace

Adam Sat Jan 12, 2013 09:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 871873)
I think the more you mention stuff, the more they want you to call something that might not be there. Why bring that to their attention. I would only say something that your area (and that could be the case here) is making sure everyone is enforcing and mostly administrative issues that have nothing to do with actual play calling. It would be like saying, "We are going to address handchecking" and the first act that looks like handchecking you are going to be seen as not doing what you suggested.

Not saying I am right, I just think you open yourself up the more you talk in that meeting.

Peace

Agreed.

I'm not a fan of a coach making the "you've gotta help him" comment to one official. That's a personal dig, and I have no problem with the T. He doesn't need to vent when the call is that clear and correct.

BktBallRef Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ODog (Post 871865)
I ALWAYS mention the contact-above-the-shoulder thing during the captains' meeting. Doesn't do much for the coaches or most of the players, but that's all you've got ... I think.

Why?

Rich Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:04pm

When the coach asked if you were a varsity official, I would've said "this isn't a varsity game."

Rich Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 871874)
Agreed.

I'm not a fan of a coach making the "you've gotta help him" comment to one official. That's a personal dig, and I have no problem with the T. He doesn't need to vent when the call is that clear and correct.

Yup.

bob jenkins Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rooster (Post 871853)
Coach to my partner (before I can get out of there and administer): "You gotta help him out here."

Me: "Okay -- good call Rooster."

(oh yeah -- no T, based just on the comment and not on any animation)

Rooster Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 871876)
When the coach asked if you were a varsity official, I would've said "this isn't a varsity game."

What I WANTED to say was "Are you a varsity coach?" The swelling is just now starting to go down from where I bit my lip... :D

ODog Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 871875)
Why?

So if it happens and is called the way the POE suggests, fewer people can be beside themselves.

Raymond Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 871874)
Agreed.

I'm not a fan of a coach making the "you've gotta help him" comment to one official. That's a personal dig, and I have no problem with the T. He doesn't need to vent when the call is that clear and correct.

I have no problem with that T either, especially within the context of what had been said earlier. That particular comment is a pet peeve of mine.

DRJ1960 Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:01pm

Good "T"

just another ref Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:08pm

I probably don't have a T for these words, unless, as others have said, they are accompanied by excessive gestures or whatever.

I don't have a problem with "You gotta help him out......" unless my partner actually comes to help.:eek:

JRutledge Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 871893)
I probably don't have a T for these words, unless, as others have said, they are accompanied by excessive gestures or whatever.

I don't have a problem with "You gotta help him out......" unless my partner actually comes to help.:eek:

If I T'd someone up for that, then I would triple or quadruple my totals of Ts. I just tell coaches, "I do not have to do a darn thing." Usually stops that mess. ;)

Peace

Mregor Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:08am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 871876)
When the coach asked if you were a varsity official, I would've said "this isn't a varsity game."

How about, "Are you a varsity coach?" :D

bainsey Sun Jan 13, 2013 02:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 871874)
I'm not a fan of a coach making the "you've gotta help him" comment to one official. That's a personal dig, and I have no problem with the T. He doesn't need to vent when the call is that clear and correct.

+1

If this were the first time the coach crossed the line, I'd probably give a "not again," but after repeated issues, starting with pre-game, I'd cite ABS.

FWIW, there's still some ignorance about the elbow above the shoulders POE. There was such a foul in tonight's UMaine/UAlbany game, and the officials went to review the video of the foul. When the replay aired, the color commentator boldly stated, "That's not more than a foul. He (the defender) has to give him SOME room, doesn't he?" (Argh!) Very quickly, you could hear someone telling the announcing crew F1 is required for such fouls.

JRutledge Sun Jan 13, 2013 03:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 871916)
+1

If this were the first time the coach crossed the line, I'd probably give a "not again," but after repeated issues, starting with pre-game, I'd cite ABS.

FWIW, there's still some ignorance about the elbow above the shoulders POE. There was such a foul in tonight's UMaine/UAlbany game, and the officials went to review the video of the foul. When the replay aired, the color commentator boldly stated, "That's not more than a foul. He (the defender) has to give him SOME room, doesn't he?" (Argh!) Very quickly, you could hear someone telling the announcing crew F1 is required for such fouls.

Yes there is, but college actually changed their rules to reflect what the NF wants to imply should be called. The NF never changed their rule they gave an interpretation.

Peace


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1