![]() |
Kentucky vs Vandy
Hello all,
I decided to finally make an account, but did anyone happen to catch the end of this game. Kentucky player released ball for the shot around a full second after shot clock expired. I believe the ref said to the announcers its not reviewable. Why would that be? |
It's built into the rule. You can't go to the monitor to determine whether a shot was released before the shot-clock expired unless there are zeroes on the game clock.
|
It is not a reviewable situation under the rules, it is that simple. You can review a shot at the end of the half, but not to see if a shot was off before the shot clock expired.
Peace |
Anyone else think this is possibly a result of Vandy being different with the location of their shot clocks?
|
Quote:
Peace |
In the NBA this would be a reviewable play. The would review the shot at the next timeout or period break. And if the last mandatory timeout has been taken, they'll take a look at the first clock stoppage.
|
Quote:
The benches and coaching boxes are on the end lines, too. |
Quote:
|
I went to an SEC school for grad school and it baffles me that nobody ever forced Vandy to put things in the proper places.
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
I'm not making excuses for them. Quite frankly, it's insane that this isn't reviewable. The tool is there - let them use it. |
|
I just watched it again. Sounds on the telecast like the horn was after the shot left the hand. Could be the distance the sound had to travel, I guess.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I also have no problem with these being not being reviewable because you could do that every single time up the court. Sometimes we need to just officiate and video is not going to solve everything. I do not even see anything that makes me feel this was a slam dunk either way. Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48pm. |