![]() |
Inconsistency a second time
Reading the new interpretations
SITUATION 1: While A1's free throw is in flight, B1, in a marked lane space, enters the lane. A1's free throw hits the ring and bounces straight up and hits a wire over the basket or hits the ring and goes over the backboard. RULING: The official should sound the whistle and call a violation on B1. A1 is given a substitute free throw. (9-1-4 Penalty 2b) Can someone tell me the rationale of this? I dont see how this is justifable under 9-1-4 where both teams violate... This is not marked lane space,not behind the free throw line/3pt lane, not disconcertion, and not faking... The rule they quote is for violation by opponent only.... This makes no sense to me... |
Hitting a wire or going over the backboard occur when there is no team possession, and hence we use the AP arrow. Instead, in this case we enforce the violation by B.
|
Quote:
It is a violation to enter the lane before the FT hits the rim or backboard. |
Quote:
There is no violation by team A, hitting the wire ends the free throw and is not a violation. All team A did was miss the free throw, B's violation is then penalized. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
9-1-4 refers to free throw provisions violated by both teams. B1 violated by entering early while A1 never committed a free throw violation but rather an OOB violation.
|
Quote:
Duh! Told you i was missing something... Thanks |
Team A hasn't violated.
When the ball hits the wire, the shot is missed. It's no different than if the FT had hit the rim and then bounced up and over the backboard. Enforce the violation by B after the shot is missed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58am. |