![]() |
Quote:
Camron: Its not my intepretation. It was the interpretation that was given to me at least 35 years ago. That said, I am, more or less, neutral in this debate; even though I feel very comfortable making the call using the interpretation I was given at least 35 years ago. Sadly, I never asked for a reason, i.e., rule basis for this interpretation so I can only surmise what it might have been. That said, I just got home from a courier run and have to get ready for a WCBOA rules/mechanics meeting tonight; Daryl "The Preacher" H. Long, Junior, and I are having dinner before the meeting (the dinner is a tax deduction, :D). And I am preparing a letter regarding a RULING in a new CB Play in the 2012-13 NFHS Casebook which is absolutely flat out wrong and cannot be defended by rule which will take come before this debate. But I do have something to add later to this debate. MTD, Sr. |
Quote:
Okay. I had forgot about this thread but it lays out my position and I will not disavow it. In fact, that is my story and I am sticking with it. Thank you APG for finding it for me. It means I do not have to type it out all over again. MTD, Sr. |
Quote:
Guess what question showed up on our closed-book rule exam last night! I actually smiled when I saw it, because I thought of this thread, but it was the only question that caused confusion. Our interp had to advise us to "answer the question as it is." I foresee an interesting discussion when the test gets handed back. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51am. |