The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   3 Point line Rule History? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/92658-3-point-line-rule-history.html)

Mark Padgett Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by letemplay (Post 858425)
Were officials mechanics the same as now far as 3-PT signals?

No. We would raise both arms when the try went up and then raise a third arm if the try was successful.


Mark:

Thats cold, real cold.

MTD, Sr.

APG Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 858373)
Whatever the date is, it looms as one of the darkest days in the history of the sport, right up there with adoption of the possession arrow.

I have never understood people who think ill of the three point shot.

BktBallRef Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark padgett (Post 858523)
no. We would raise both arms when the try went up and then raise a third arm if the try was successful.

+10 :)

JRutledge Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by APG (Post 858524)
I have never understood people who think ill of the three point shot.

I don't either.

Peace

amusedofficial Tue Oct 16, 2012 01:01am

Why I think ill of the three point shot
 
Basketball is a game, not a skills competition. I don't like it because a field goal is a field goal is a field goal, and awarding a long shot 50 percent more points than a basket you work for destroys the essential balance of the game.

Camron Rust Tue Oct 16, 2012 02:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 858541)
Basketball is a game, not a skills competition. I don't like it because a field goal is a field goal is a field goal, and awarding a long shot 50 percent more points than a basket you work for destroys the essential balance of the game.

All nice except that the game was changing anyway. The purpose of the 3-point line was not to make longs shots worth more but to open up the lane. The interior game was becoming increasingly clogged up. With bigger players, it just wasn't the same as the game was designed. By creating a more valuable long distance shot, it spread the game back out again and actually made it more possible to run intricate plays for interior shots.

bainsey Tue Oct 16, 2012 05:27am

I went to high school in Maine and South Carolina. In South Carolina (a private school league), the 3-point line (same distance as today) was brought in my junior year, 1983-84. Maine picked it up when the NFHS adopted it.

letemplay Tue Oct 16, 2012 08:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark padgett (Post 858523)
no. We would raise both arms when the try went up and then raise a third arm if the try was successful.

That's good...hope the table can see your third limb

Mark Padgett Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 858541)
Basketball is a game, not a skills competition.

Yes, it's a game - a game you win based on how well you utilize your skills. Are you saying they shouldn't have widened the lane either, when George Mikan became unstoppable due primarily to his size?

Rich Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:19am

Comments towards posters and their perceived intelligence will be deleted.

Camron Rust Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 859129)
Comments towards posters and their perceived intelligence will be deleted.


Rich, you are a genius. :eek:

Adam Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 859165)
Rich, you are a genius. :eek:

That's unacceptable. This is your warning. ;)

amusedofficial Fri Nov 09, 2012 02:32am

One can shoot long field goals all day, every day. Jerry Lucas could turn a game around by shooting from outside because it brought the other team's big guys out of the lane.

Shoot outside all you want, no rule has ever prohibited or discouraged the practrice.

I just do not now,nor have I ever, understood why such a shot deserves more points than other successful field goals.

Shall we award a run and a half on a successful steal of home? How about nine points for a touchdown on a run from scrimmage from inside your own 20? Maybe unassisted goals ought to be worth three goals to make up for the assists not awarded.

BillyMac Fri Nov 09, 2012 07:54am

Calvinball ???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 861493)
Shall we award a run and a half on a successful steal of home? How about nine points for a touchdown on a run from scrimmage from inside your own 20? Maybe unassisted goals ought to be worth three goals to make up for the assists not awarded.

Man. I hope that Bud Selig, Roger Goodell, and Gary Bettman don't read this Forum.

http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=I.50368...h=125&c=7&rs=1

HawkeyeCubP Sun Nov 11, 2012 01:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 861493)
One can shoot long field goals all day, every day. Jerry Lucas could turn a game around by shooting from outside because it brought the other team's big guys out of the lane.

Shoot outside all you want, no rule has ever prohibited or discouraged the practrice.

I just do not now,nor have I ever, understood why such a shot deserves more points than other successful field goals.

Shall we award a run and a half on a successful steal of home? How about nine points for a touchdown on a run from scrimmage from inside your own 20? Maybe unassisted goals ought to be worth three goals to make up for the assists not awarded.

Just stirring the pot a little here, but FWIW, basketball isn't the only sport that does this.

And mathematically speaking, the margin for error (and therefore, difficulty) increases the further away from the goal the shooter is.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1