The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Norfolk State v. Missouri Throw-In Play (10.0 Seconds Left) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/89927-norfolk-state-v-missouri-throw-play-10-0-seconds-left.html)

APG Fri Mar 16, 2012 07:06pm

Norfolk State v. Missouri Throw-In Play (10.0 Seconds Left)
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gLQdWYg5yso" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

As requested by Nevadaref

Lotto Fri Mar 16, 2012 07:57pm

Legal.

Raymond Fri Mar 16, 2012 08:43pm

That play was correct. There was a foul call a few minutes earlier where Hightower made the call from the Lead across the paint on a what looked like a clean block by Norfolk St. Don't have a timestamp for it though. I'll check the play-by-play and see if I can find it.

Lcubed48 Sat Mar 17, 2012 02:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 832508)
That play was correct. There was a foul call a few minutes earlier where Hightower made the call from the Lead across the paint on a what looked like a clean block by Norfolk St. Don't have a timestamp for it though. I'll check the play-by-play and see if I can find it.

I saw that play live. I agree with that assessment. It looked clean to me. The defender came up from behind to make the play. My perception of his angle would have been to be looking through the shooter to see any contact by the defender.
However on the OOB play, he nailed it - IMHO - despite being out of position.

Nevadaref Sat Mar 17, 2012 03:37am

As I stated in my initial request, I thought the play was legal, but why Hightower would stand 6-8 feet inbounds while thrower has the ball is baffling. Looks extremely lazy and definitely poor positioning for an end line decision. He's just about even with the C. Ouch!

vbzebra Sat Mar 17, 2012 04:45am

anyone have the final throw-in by Missouri? Timeout was called with 2.9 inside the key right around the foul line (per the lovely throw in diagram, ball should have been inbounded in the backcourt on the end line, right?)...any guess as to why ball was inbounded in backcourt on the sideline??

JetMetFan Sat Mar 17, 2012 05:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by vbzebra (Post 832620)
anyone have the final throw-in by Missouri? Timeout was called with 2.9 inside the key right around the foul line (per the lovely throw in diagram, ball should have been inbounded in the backcourt on the end line, right?)...any guess as to why ball was inbounded in backcourt on the sideline??

Here it is. It was in another thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer (Post 832495)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d1Z7Z26Ysf8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Bad Zebra Sat Mar 17, 2012 05:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by vbzebra (Post 832620)
anyone have the final throw-in by Missouri? Timeout was called with 2.9 inside the key right around the foul line (per the lovely throw in diagram, ball should have been inbounded in the backcourt on the end line, right?)...any guess as to why ball was inbounded in backcourt on the sideline??

Player steps out of the lane just as the second whistle is blown. Official probably glanced up and decides he was out of the lane when he chooses to recognize the request. Correct position for throw in if that's the case.

Nevadaref Sat Mar 17, 2012 06:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra (Post 832623)
Player steps out of the lane just as the second whistle is blown. Official probably glanced up and decides he was out of the lane when he chooses to recognize the request. Correct position for throw in if that's the case.

Nope, that's still wrong. The diagram extends well outside the lane. Still should have been unbounded on the end line. They just got it wrong.

BillyMac Sat Mar 17, 2012 09:00am

The Rocket Ship Diagram © 2009, Back In The Saddle ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 832628)
Nope, that's still wrong. The diagram extends well outside the lane. Still should have been unbounded on the end line. They just got it wrong.

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3582/3...70756e11_m.jpg

Bad Zebra Sat Mar 17, 2012 09:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 832628)
Nope, that's still wrong. The diagram extends well outside the lane. Still should have been unbounded on the end line. They just got it wrong.

It was pretty close to the point where the "pyramid" meets the free throw line. I looked again and it looks like he awarded based on the ballhandlers position after he walks out after the whistle. Definitely sloppy/lazy.

Possibly a good point to emphasize teamwork by a crew...non-calling official might have helped by observing ball location after partner hit his whistle.

vbzebra Sat Mar 17, 2012 01:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMetFan (Post 832622)
Here it is. It was in another thread.

oops, my bad, sorry. just saw it :D

ballgame99 Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:58am

On the OP, what is the rule? He doesn't need two feet established? His one foot is not OB but not established on the court.

APG Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 833052)
On the OP, what is the rule? He doesn't need two feet established? His one foot is not OB but not established on the court.

No level of basketball requires two feet inbounds to "reestablish" inbounds...you need something inbounds and nothing out of bounds to be considered inbounds.

zm1283 Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 833052)
On the OP, what is the rule? He doesn't need two feet established? His one foot is not OB but not established on the court.

You need something touching inbounds and nothing touching out of bounds. No need for two feet. Legal play.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1