![]() |
6 players in game "discovered while being violated"
I know that there have been numerous posts on this issue over the years, but perhaps this situation is a little different.
1.7 seconds to go in 3rd quarter. multiple subs for team A (and the officials allowed them to come in sequentially - not the topic). Ball inbounded and the quarter ends. B coach alerts officials that A had six on the court. The official can count 6 as they have to walk past him/her to get back to their bench. Does this satisfy "if discovered while being violated"? Or is the fact that the quarter ended and no official noticed the 6 players prior to the dead ball to end the quarter controlling. Any different answer if not the end of a quarter and there is a violation and during the dead ball the official notices that there are 6 players on the court? |
That sounds like one you might let slide.
|
Quote:
|
Also check out case play 10.1.6(b).
|
Duh!
Thanks guys. direct case book play. when i searched the case book electronically i entered "discovered" and that play did not show up as the language in that play is "detected".
Seems pretty clear. Turns out in our play one official has indicated he knew just prior to the horn (but didn't pull the trigger) and the other official not until after the buzzer.... |
Right Back At You ...
Quote:
|
Step Right Up ...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Something just isn't right about the thread title.:eek:
|
Participating ...
Quote:
A team shall not: Have more than five team members participating simultaneously |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48am. |