Another First

[Adam]

Double free throw violation. B1 steps in as the shot is released, and the shot misses the rim. Second of two FTs.

[tref]

Easy way out could be disconcertion on B1.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by tref

Easy way out could be disconcertion on B1.

Thought about it, but couldn't justify it. He didn't enter until the ball was out of the shooter's hand. We called a few lane violations.

Gotta love MS boys.

[tref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Thought about it, but couldn't justify it. He didn't enter until the ball was out of the shooter's hand. We called a few lane violations.

Gotta love MS boys.

What about the follow through

Check the Comment under 9.1.3 Situation H when you have a moment.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by tref

What about the follow through

Check the Comment under 9.1.3 Situation H when you have a moment.

He said he thought about it. Isn't that what "consider" means?

[tref]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

He said he thought about it. Isn't that what "consider" means?

He also said, "but couldnt justify it" I was just saying it "could be" by rule.
If that is okay by you??


*NOTE: The bolded text in his quote related to the bolded text in my answer.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by tref

What about the follow through

Check the Comment under 9.1.3 Situation H when you have a moment.

Yeah, I don't call fouls when the follow through wrist is hit, either.

[Toren]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Double free throw violation. B1 steps in as the shot is released, and the shot misses the rim. Second of two FTs.

Is there more?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Toren

Is there more?

We went to the arrow.

[tref]

From a game management standpoint, hopefully the arrow was pointing the other way?

If not, I'm sure Team B would've prefered giving up an extra FT as opposed to the chance for a 4 or 5 point play.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by tref

From a game management standpoint, hopefully the arrow was pointing the other way?

If not, I'm sure Team B would've prefered giving up an extra FT as opposed to the chance for a 4 or 5 point play.

It wasn't that big a deal; just told the coaches what the rule was, and they were both fine with it. It was an odd enough situation that I took a moment to explain it to them. It ended up being B's ball, but explaining the arrow is the rule would have soothed the issue if it went to A.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by tref

From a game management standpoint, hopefully the arrow was pointing the other way?

If not, I'm sure Team B would've prefered giving up an extra FT as opposed to the chance for a 4 or 5 point play.

Why should that matter. If B wanted the best outcome, they wouldn't have violated. In that case, they'd get the ball AND keep the arrow.

[tref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Why should that matter. If B wanted the best outcome, they wouldn't have violated. In that case, they'd get the ball AND keep the arrow.

True story! Just looking at the big picture. Sorta like when a ticky tack foul is called for a passer on a wide open dunk.

[Toren]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

We went to the arrow.

+1

I pretty much knew you had it correct, since you pointed out it was the 2nd of 2 free throws, I just wanted to have you spell it out for those that were interested.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Toren

+1

I pretty much knew you had it correct, since you pointed out it was the 2nd of 2 free throws, I just wanted to have you spell it out for those that were interested.

I thought I'd pause for effect.