The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   POI 2003-2004 (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/8654-poi-2003-2004-a.html)

mick Fri May 16, 2003 08:49am

http://www.nfhs.org/Sports/basketball_emphasis.htm

ChuckElias Fri May 16, 2003 08:57am

Ho-hum. Anybody find any of that interesting?

No reflection on mick for posting it; I'm glad somebody did. But it's essentially exactly the same as last year.

BktBallRef Fri May 16, 2003 09:36am

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Ho-hum. Anybody find any of that interesting?
Chuck, your apathy is showing. :)

I was interested to read what they had to say about TO Administration and some of the points made on Rough play. Actually, in one way it's good that new problems aren't arising but shows we still have work to do in addressing some of the old ones.

ChuckElias Fri May 16, 2003 09:56am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Chuck, your apathy is showing. :)
Jeez, sorry. I'll pull my pants up above my hips!

Quote:

I was interested to read what they had to say about TO Administration and some of the points made on Rough play.
But it was exactly the same as last year. The only changes were the shaded parts, about playing to the crowd and continued diligence during pre-game warmups.

Chuck

BktBallRef Fri May 16, 2003 10:14am

Better look again.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
But it was exactly the same as last year.
Actually, the lists are different.

2003-2004:

2. Rough Play – Guidelines For Teaching And Officiating
A. Handchecking
B. Screening
C. Post Play
D. Rebounding
E. Block/Charge
F. Officiating Points

2002-2003:

4. Rough Play
A. Hands off
B. Post-play
C. Screens
D. Protecting the Shooter
E. Excess Swinging of Arm(s)/Elbow(s)

Better pull those pants a little higher. ;)

ChuckElias Fri May 16, 2003 10:32am

Re: Better look again.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Actually, the lists are different.
LOL, oops! Sorry. It wasn't apathy, it was laziness. I read:

Quote:

1. Sporting Behavior (Repeated from 2002-03, except shaded area)
and thought the parenthetical part applied to the entire POE list. Guess I'll "look again".

Chuck

[Edited by ChuckElias on May 16th, 2003 at 11:38 AM]

DrC. Fri May 16, 2003 12:33pm

Isn't #3 Free Throw Admin New ???

Max of 4 defense and 2 offense. Noone in the 4th spots at all ???

ChuckElias Fri May 16, 2003 12:58pm

From the title of this thread, I was hoping that the NF had adopted the NCAA procedure for administering technical fouls. Darn.

wizard Fri May 16, 2003 02:23pm

D. Rebounding. This is the one that I found interesting.


To obtain or maintain a legal rebounding position a player may not:
1.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Displace, charge or push an opponent.
2.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical, so that the opponentÂ’s freedom of movement is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.
3.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Bend his or her body in an abnormal position to hold or displace an opponent.


Doesn't boxing out violate some or all of these points?


fref Fri May 16, 2003 03:07pm

Can anyone tell me what the definition of Hooking is and where it is shown as a violation in the NF rules? I see it is covered under hand checking in the "point of emphasis."

Mark Padgett Fri May 16, 2003 04:23pm

Quote:

Originally posted by fref
Can anyone tell me what the definition of Hooking is and where it is shown as a violation in the NF rules? I see it is covered under hand checking in the "point of emphasis."

In most areas, hooking is only illegal if you pay for it.

Back In The Saddle Fri May 16, 2003 04:59pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:

Originally posted by fref
Can anyone tell me what the definition of Hooking is and where it is shown as a violation in the NF rules? I see it is covered under hand checking in the "point of emphasis."

In most areas, hooking is only illegal if you pay for it.

Must work differently in your area. In my area, the hooker GETS paid. :D

bob jenkins Fri May 16, 2003 09:55pm

Quote:

Originally posted by wizard
D. Rebounding. This is the one that I found interesting.


To obtain or maintain a legal rebounding position a player may not:
1.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Displace, charge or push an opponent.
2.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical, so that the opponentÂ’s freedom of movement is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.
3.Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Bend his or her body in an abnormal position to hold or displace an opponent.


Doesn't boxing out violate some or all of these points?


Not if done properly.

THe way some coaches teach it, yes. And that's part of the reason we get those strange looks when we call the fouls.


Back In The Saddle Sat May 17, 2003 12:41pm

Quote:

Originally posted by bob jenkins


Not if done properly.

THe way some coaches teach it, yes. And that's part of the reason we get those strange looks when we call the fouls.


Grrrr, called one of these just this week. Guy is "boxing out" and sends his opponent flying across the key, landing on his keyster. When I called the foul he starts gesturing wildly and says to me, "IT'S CALLED BOXING OUT!" He probably didn't even know what I meant when I replied, "no, it's called displacement." :rolleyes:

Mark Padgett Sat May 17, 2003 01:08pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:

Originally posted by fref
Can anyone tell me what the definition of Hooking is and where it is shown as a violation in the NF rules? I see it is covered under hand checking in the "point of emphasis."

In most areas, hooking is only illegal if you pay for it.

Must work differently in your area. In my area, the hooker GETS paid. :D

A guy sent his girlfriend out to be a hooker. She came back after the first night. He asked her how much money she made. She told him she made $150.25.

"One hundred fifty dollars and twenty-five cents???, he said. "Who gave you a quarter?"

She replied, "Everybody".

wizard Mon May 19, 2003 07:19am

Quote:

[i]Originally posted by bob jenkins [/B]
Not if done properly.

THe way some coaches teach it, yes. And that's part of the reason we get those strange looks when we call the fouls.

[/B][/QUOTE]

I agree (somewhat). But when players maintain their position, don't they:
2. Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical, so that the opponentÂ’s freedom of movement is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.?

Hawks Coach, what's your take?

BktBallRef Mon May 19, 2003 10:43am

Quote:

Originally posted by wizard


But when players maintain their position, don't they:
2. Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical, so that the opponentÂ’s freedom of movement is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.?

No, they don't. Your question and answer are a contradiction. They can't maintain their position AND do the things described in #2.

That's why fouls are called, and that's why coaches yell because many think that they can do those things.

wizard Mon May 19, 2003 11:21am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by wizard


But when players maintain their position, don't they:
2. Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical, so that the opponentÂ’s freedom of movement is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.?

No, they don't. Your question and answer are a contradiction. They can't maintain their position AND do the things described in #2.

That's why fouls are called, and that's why coaches yell because many think that they can do those things.

I beg to differ. I don't see too many players who maintain their position without getting low and wide then extending their arms fully or partially.

Hawks Coach Mon May 19, 2003 04:10pm

Wizard
Typical rebounding blockout position. Yes they extend their arms, elbows, etc - a bit - if hands are down, they will be just outside the knees. Hips are down and back a bit, but not excessively or abnormally so. Feet are probably slightly more than shoulder width, but that is really true with most athletic stances - again, not exceptionally so. Remember - you have to be balanced to block out well.

Now here is the key. The players cannot extend arms to block out. The arms are extended to maintain balance, not to impede an opponent's normal movements. The back of their hips engages the opponent, and they need to move their feet to maintain position as the player attempts to move around them. If they use their arms to keep from getting beat (extending them backwards or to the side), it should be a foul. If they extend anything into the path of the player that is beating them to hinder that player (leg, foot, arm, elbow, hip), it should be a foul. Of course, the important thing to judge is how much contact is too much contact when it comes to the arms, but it is usually obvious when a player is not moving the feet and is solely using the arms to impede movement. The arms will always slightly impede motion, but should not be the primary means of blocking out.

This is how I read the rule and see it enforced in games. Seems fair to me.

wizard Mon May 19, 2003 04:24pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
Wizard
Typical rebounding blockout position. Yes they extend their arms, elbows, etc - a bit - if hands are down, they will be just outside the knees. Hips are down and back a bit, but not excessively or abnormally so. Feet are probably slightly more than shoulder width, but that is really true with most athletic stances - again, not exceptionally so. Remember - you have to be balanced to block out well.

Now here is the key. The players cannot extend arms to block out. The arms are extended to maintain balance, not to impede an opponent's normal movements. The back of their hips engages the opponent, and they need to move their feet to maintain position as the player attempts to move around them. If they use their arms to keep from getting beat (extending them backwards or to the side), it should be a foul. If they extend anything into the path of the player that is beating them to hinder that player (leg, foot, arm, elbow, hip), it should be a foul. Of course, the important thing to judge is how much contact is too much contact when it comes to the arms, but it is usually obvious when a player is not moving the feet and is solely using the arms to impede movement. The arms will always slightly impede motion, but should not be the primary means of blocking out.

This is how I read the rule and see it enforced in games. Seems fair to me.

HC,
I am not in total disagreement with you but when it is stated...

"a player may not extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical,"

Then extending their arms, elbows, etc - a bit - if hands are down, they will be just outside the knees, is a no-no.


Hawks Coach Mon May 19, 2003 05:44pm

You can extend your hands anywhere you want, anytime you want. Just don't make illegal contact when doing so. The reason the rule is stated as such is to make clear that if you put your hands, arms, elbows, etc., out there, you don't own that space in addition to the space over your feet. There is no violation nor penalty listed for extending hands illegally - just for making illegal contact when doing so.

If you move your feet and maintain the block out with your hips, you will be fine regardless of where any part of the rest of your body is because you aren't making contact with any other part of your body. If you don't move your feet, and your arms in their extended postion become all that you contact the oppontnet with, the contact will be deemed illegal if it gives you an advantage (i.e., hinders the opponent from making normal movements). If you make contact but gain no illegal advantage, play on because the your opponent just went around you for a rebound.

Nevadaref Tue May 20, 2003 01:13am

Quote:

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
You can extend your hands anywhere you want, anytime you want. Just don't make illegal contact when doing so. The reason the rule is stated as such is to make clear that if you put your hands, arms, elbows, etc., out there, you don't own that space in addition to the space over your feet. There is no violation nor penalty listed for extending hands illegally - just for making illegal contact when doing so.

If you move your feet and maintain the block out with your hips, you will be fine regardless of where any part of the rest of your body is because you aren't making contact with any other part of your body. If you don't move your feet, and your arms in their extended postion become all that you contact the oppontnet with, the contact will be deemed illegal if it gives you an advantage (i.e., hinders the opponent from making normal movements). If you make contact but gain no illegal advantage, play on because the your opponent just went around you for a rebound.

This is well said.

ChuckElias Tue May 20, 2003 07:43am

Quote:

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
You can extend your hands anywhere you want, anytime you want. Just don't make illegal contact when doing so. The reason the rule is stated as such is to make clear that if you put your hands, arms, elbows, etc., out there, you don't own that space in addition to the space over your feet. There is no violation nor penalty listed for extending hands illegally - just for making illegal contact when doing so.

If you move your feet and maintain the block out with your hips, you will be fine regardless of where any part of the rest of your body is because you aren't making contact with any other part of your body. If you don't move your feet, and your arms in their extended postion become all that you contact the oppontnet with, the contact will be deemed illegal if it gives you an advantage (i.e., hinders the opponent from making normal movements). If you make contact but gain no illegal advantage, play on because the your opponent just went around you for a rebound.

So Coach, when are you taking the FED test, hmmmmm? Thumbs up, man.

wizard Tue May 20, 2003 07:56am

Quote:

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
You can extend your hands anywhere you want, anytime you want. Just don't make illegal contact when doing so. The reason the rule is stated as such is to make clear that if you put your hands, arms, elbows, etc., out there, you don't own that space in addition to the space over your feet. There is no violation nor penalty listed for extending hands illegally - just for making illegal contact when doing so.

If you move your feet and maintain the block out with your hips, you will be fine regardless of where any part of the rest of your body is because you aren't making contact with any other part of your body. If you don't move your feet, and your arms in their extended postion become all that you contact the oppontnet with, the contact will be deemed illegal if it gives you an advantage (i.e., hinders the opponent from making normal movements). If you make contact but gain no illegal advantage, play on because the your opponent just went around you for a rebound.

Coach,
Thanks for the clarification. But if that's what the rule means, then why isn't it stated that way? Then again, if the rules book wasn't written the way it is, we wouldn't have this wonderful forum to discuss how the game is played, coached and officiated.

Hawks Coach Wed May 21, 2003 07:03am

Wizard
I think the rule is quite clear - you just quoted the first line of it. The rule states (with my emphasis):

Extend shoulders, hips, knees or extend the arms or elbows fully or partially in a position other than vertical so that the freedom of movement of an opponent is hindered when contact with the arms or elbows occurs.

Bend his/her body in an abnormal position to hold or displace an opponent.

No displacement, no holding, no hindering = no foul.

wizard Wed May 21, 2003 08:23am

Coach,
Well said and thanks for insight.

fref Wed May 21, 2003 04:22pm

I feel almost immoral for asking a question about hooking twice; but NFHS Points of Emphasis for 2003 includes the following:

"Hooking" by the offensive players should be presumed a definite advantage. This is not a judgment call or tactic worthy of a warning. It is a foul and should be called without hesitation."

I have not been officiating long and therefore I may be missing it, but I see no reference to "hooking" in the rules book. And, I see no NFHS signal to indicate "hooking".

I assume "hooking" is a move by the offensive player with the ball, in which he or she pivots by a defensive player in such a way as to effectively hold the defensive player.



Hawks Coach Wed May 21, 2003 05:04pm

I understand hooking to mean using the arm to hook an opponent when going around them. I read your post to refer to using the leg when pivoting past an opponent. But NFHS has used a street term without defining it in the rules.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1