Foul question
 

End of game situation. team in lead broke away for a lay up. Def player pushed shooter in the back and knocks shooter down into the wall. I know this should be intentional but should the defended be ejected?

Judgment call based upon the nature and severity of the act.

Shooter went down hard and could have injured the wrist???????

On a regular foul or block charge players hit the deck and could injure something. This isn't a response that adds anything. Was it a hard push or a standard shove that is just an intentional versus flagrant. It's a had to be there scenario rather than all your ???????

Could be intentional, could be flagrant. Depends upon the severity of the act.

I had this exact situation a couple of years ago and I judged it to be flagrant.

An intentional foul (which you say it is) does not carry an additional penalty of ejection / DQ.

I've had this situation three times in the last 2 seasons...

I called all three intentional, and, in hindsight, one of them should've been flagrant. Totally depends on the severity of the act.

To rephrase the question in better Officialese: the foul is at least intentional. Should it be flagrant?

Or the frequency. Had a player once (in FB game) do this once in the second quarter, and once in the third quarter. I stuck him with an INT on the first play, my partner tossed him on the second one. Second was a bit harder than the first, but there was no way we were going to let him finish the game at this point.

At minimum, an intentional foul. Very possibly a flagrant foul.