![]() |
another block/charge "twist"
Two whistle game, I'm at Lead. Defender has LGP established in the paint. Big kid dribbling in from half court. Easy to tell he's going to the bucket hard, so I'm making sure the defender maintains LGP. Feet planted, arms straight up, he's good. At the last split second the defender "twists" his torso (only) to the left so he doesn't take it right in the face. Didn't completely bail out, but didn't move legs or feet. Just twisted. Must admit it surprised me, but I stayed with the charge.
Its a good HTBT, but nothing more than what I described. Would you penalize the defender for this? Anything you would add or do differently? |
Quote:
|
Based on your description, I'm going with the PC as well, no question.
|
Quote:
|
Once LGP is established, the defender can move laterally or backwards to maintain LGP, and can duck in anticipation of imminent contact. The feet don't have to be stationary, although that's one of the indicators
Sounds like a good call to me. |
Here's the problem with the twist. Defender is stationary, with the dribbler coming straight at him. At the last possible moment, naturally, the dribbler makes a move to try and go around. The defender makes the twist described above. He may or may not move a foot. Trouble is, most fans, and, let's face it, some officials, say "He was moving," and call a block.
Also, on a related note, even if the defender doesn't move at all, some think that if the contact is not centered directly on the torso of the defender and the defender doesn't subsequently fall down, it can't be a charge. |
Sounds like the correct call to me, too.
4-23 |
Quote:
Too many officials penalize the defense IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
4-23-3-e "After the initial legal guarding position is obtained, the guard may turn or duck to absorb the shock of imminent contact." |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39am. |