![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know we want to take the focus off ourselves, but if someone makes a scene by peeling off a uniform and storming out in anger, that's hard NOT to call. Who does that? We don't make the call to be jerks. We make the call to prevent crap like this. What we don't call comes across as condoning. |
Quote:
But the rest might not draw anything from me if it is clear the player is quitting the team. In general I really do not worry about something that is likely never going to happen to any of us. It might have happened here, but I doubt most of us will ever have this dilemma honestly. Peace |
Quote:
I don't see how you get out of this without a T. What you can't do is ignore it, even if the player wasn't the free thrower, because you have no guarantee that he isn't coming back. |
I'm with Eastshire on this one. Again, there's no reason for him to be off the floor. Someone has to shoot the free throws, and if it's not A1, and if there's nothing but himself preventing him from being on the floor, something has to happen.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Assuming you know what's going on, then the rules about the jersey and leaving the court aren't going to apply. If the disgust is with the officiating, then they do apply. |
Quote:
The rules don't say it's a technical to leave the court if upset with an official but not if upset with a coach. It's a technical for leaving for an unauthorized reason and not wanting to play any more isn't an authorized reason. I don't understand why we're trying to bend over backwards to not penalize a team for clear violations of the rules. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In this case, I tell him he's welcome to suspend the kid after he shoots his free throws or after he's disqualified. To me, there's a material difference between a coach telling me a member of bench personnel isn't eligible and telling me a player isn't eligible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28pm. |