The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 09, 2003, 10:30pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Question

A1 is dribbling in his backcourt. He gets one foot in the frontcourt and has dribbled in the frontcourt when he picks up his dribble. He is standing on one foot - the foot that is in the frontcourt. He stands there on the one foot (without his other foot having touched in the frontcourt) for a few seconds then passes the ball to A2 who is still in their backcourt.

Violation?
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 09, 2003, 10:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 272
Send a message via AIM to firedoc
I believe that once he picks up his dribble and lifts the foot that was in the backcourt he has attained frontcourt status. In that case the pass to the player in his backcourt would constitute a violation.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2003, 05:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 380
Send a message via ICQ to ROMANO Send a message via AIM to ROMANO
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
A1 is dribbling in his backcourt. He gets one foot in the frontcourt and has dribbled in the frontcourt when he picks up his dribble. He is standing on one foot - the foot that is in the frontcourt. He stands there on the one foot (without his other foot having touched in the frontcourt) for a few seconds then passes the ball to A2 who is still in their backcourt.

Violation?
YES!
This is a violation.when his foot touched the frontcourt (and the ball is in the player hends)it consider that the player is in the frontcourt.
__________________
THE ISRAELI OFFICIAL IS BACK
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2003, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
I'm going to disagree. The rule states ball and "both" feet have to be in the FC to have FC status. Even though he picked up his dribble, all 3 were not in FC.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2003, 09:04pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by dblref
I'm going to disagree. The rule states ball and "both" feet have to be in the FC to have FC status. Even though he picked up his dribble, all 3 were not in FC.
You might wanna read casebook play 4.4.1(a). Might change your mind.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Oregon, OH
Posts: 166
The casebook example does not apply because it references a player who received a pass not a player dribbling the basketball. I would say legal action. IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 10:08am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by MOFFICIAL
The casebook example does not apply because it references a player who received a pass not a player dribbling the basketball. I would say legal action. IMO.

"A1 is dribbling in his backcourt. He gets one foot in the frontcourt and has dribbled in the frontcourt when he picks up his dribble."

MOFFICIAL,
The case cited references a player who is not dribbling.
mick


Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 10:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
originally posted by Mark P
A1 is dribbling in his backcourt. He gets one foot in the frontcourt and has dribbled in the frontcourt when he picks up his dribble.

Quote:
Originally posted by MOFFICIAL
The casebook example does not apply because it references a player who received a pass not a player dribbling the basketball.
But notice the original play is NOT discussing a player dribbling the ball. . . Therefore, violation.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 10:13am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
originally posted by Mark P
A1 is dribbling in his backcourt. He gets one foot in the frontcourt and has dribbled in the frontcourt when he picks up his dribble.

Quote:
Originally posted by MOFFICIAL
The casebook example does not apply because it references a player who received a pass not a player dribbling the basketball.
But notice the original play is NOT discussing a player dribbling the ball. . . Therefore, violation.
Is there an echo,echo, echo ?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
One minute?!?! One lousy stinking minute?!?! Grrrrrr!!
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 07:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
Chuck: Looking at the times registered on my computer, Mick replied at 10:09 and you replied at 10:13. I believe that is just a tad more than "one stinkin minute". Do the Bosox consider 4 minutes to be the same as 1 minute? Inquiring minds want to know!
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2003, 07:20pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Quote:
Originally posted by dblref
Chuck: Looking at the times registered on my computer, Mick replied at 10:09 and you replied at 10:13. I believe that is just a tad more than "one stinkin minute". Do the Bosox consider 4 minutes to be the same as 1 minute? Inquiring minds want to know!
No, no, no. You're checking the wrong posts. The times were only one minute apart, 7:08 and 7:09 (Pacific time). For a moment there, I thought you were going to accuse them of posting in metric time.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:
Originally posted by dblref
Chuck: Looking at the times registered on my computer, Mick replied at 10:09 and you replied at 10:13. I believe that is just a tad more than "one stinkin minute". Do the Bosox consider 4 minutes to be the same as 1 minute? Inquiring minds want to know!
No, no, no. You're checking the wrong posts. The times were only one minute apart, 7:08 and 7:09 (Pacific time). For a moment there, I thought you were going to accuse them of posting in metric time.
Interesting. I'm on EST and they showed up at the times I mentioned. Wonder why that happens? These are the times shown at the bottom of where the screen name is. For example, my post to Chuck showed up as 7:02.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally posted by dblref

Interesting. I'm on EST and they showed up at the times I mentioned. Wonder why that happens? These are the times shown at the bottom of where the screen name is. For example, my post to Chuck showed up as 7:02. [/B]
Since we've all been nitpicking lately, I'll go ahead and correct you... You're on EDT, unless you're one of those crazy Hoosiers that doesn't make the leap in time. I am on EDT as well and see your post to Chuck as 7:02
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by dblref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
You're checking the wrong posts. The times were only one minute apart, 7:08 and 7:09 (Pacific time).
Interesting. I'm on EST and they showed up at the times I mentioned.
Just to be clear, you're not looking in the wrong place for the time; you are looking at the wrong postings. I think you are absolutely correct that I made a post at the time you mentioned. But to see the posts that were made one lousy stinking minute apart, look at the two posts immediately before mick said "Is there an echo. . ."

Chuck
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1