The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Travel or held ball? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/8554-travel-held-ball.html)

Back In The Saddle Fri May 09, 2003 07:23pm

The situation:

A1 goes in for a layup, B1 reaches out and briefly touches the ball while it's still in A1's hand, then pulls his hand back--all while A1 is still in the beginning of his upward motion toward the basket. A1 returns to the floor without releasing the ball.

My question:

In my judgement, B1 did not block the shot, rather A1, expecting that B1 would block the shot, gave up and returned to the floor with the ball. Had he not given up on it, he could have easily gotten the shot off. I called it a travel. Was I right or wrong?

ChuckElias Fri May 09, 2003 07:46pm

If the defender didn't prevent him from releasing the ball, it's a travel. Good call.

rainmaker Fri May 09, 2003 07:47pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
The situation:

A1 goes in for a layup, B1 reaches out and briefly touches the ball while it's still in A1's hand, then pulls his hand back--all while A1 is still in the beginning of his upward motion toward the basket. A1 returns to the floor without releasing the ball.

My question:

In my judgement, B1 did not block the shot, rather A1, expecting that B1 would block the shot, gave up and returned to the floor with the ball. Had he not given up on it, he could have easily gotten the shot off. I called it a travel. Was I right or wrong?

I think I'd have called a jump by instinct, but I'm not sure I should have. Probably it would depend on the level. Lower grades such as JH and Freshmen, probably a jump. JV and Varsity, if these are kids with skills and experience, call the travel. But even some JV teams have brand new players who really don't know how to "Play Through."

What you really don't want is a no-call.

rainmaker Fri May 09, 2003 07:48pm

Chuck -- Now who's chicken -- on the board but not on IM!?!

Mark Padgett Fri May 09, 2003 10:32pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Chuck -- Now who's chicken -- on the board but not on IM!?!
As long as you're not that chicken in the joke, you're OK.

rainmaker Fri May 09, 2003 11:37pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Chuck -- Now who's chicken -- on the board but not on IM!?!
As long as you're not that chicken in the joke, you're OK.

Oh, Mark... GGAAAGGG!!!

Back In The Saddle Sat May 10, 2003 12:24am

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
The situation:

A1 goes in for a layup, B1 reaches out and briefly touches the ball while it's still in A1's hand, then pulls his hand back--all while A1 is still in the beginning of his upward motion toward the basket. A1 returns to the floor without releasing the ball.

My question:

In my judgement, B1 did not block the shot, rather A1, expecting that B1 would block the shot, gave up and returned to the floor with the ball. Had he not given up on it, he could have easily gotten the shot off. I called it a travel. Was I right or wrong?

I think I'd have called a jump by instinct, but I'm not sure I should have. Probably it would depend on the level. Lower grades such as JH and Freshmen, probably a jump. JV and Varsity, if these are kids with skills and experience, call the travel. But even some JV teams have brand new players who really don't know how to "Play Through."

What you really don't want is a no-call.

I agree that no call would be the worst call (with apologies to ROMANO).

Your thinking on this intrigues me. I would think that at the lower levels (this was a 7th grade boys game), that calling the travel would be the more "instructive" thing to do. I.e., the kid that didn't take the shot would learn more from the turnover than he would if I had called the jump. Perhaps I don't understand enough about players at this age?

I called what looked obvious to me. Hopefully I'll get to the point soon where the jump ball is instinctive. Some days I still feel SOOOO new :D

ROMANO Sat May 10, 2003 05:45am

JUMP-BALL!
nothing more to say.

Jurassic Referee Sat May 10, 2003 08:05am

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle


A1 goes in for a layup, B1 reaches out and briefly touches the ball while it's still in A1's hand, then pulls his hand back--all while A1 is still in the beginning of his upward motion toward the basket. A1 returns to the floor without releasing the ball.

In my judgement, B1 did not block the shot, rather A1, expecting that B1 would block the shot, gave up and returned to the floor with the ball. Had he not given up on it, he could have easily gotten the shot off. I called it a travel. Was I right or wrong?

The call is strictly up to your judgement.If you thought,as above,that B1 didn't prevent A1 from shooting or passing,then it definitely is a travel. FED casebook play 4.43.3SitA(c) is the exact same play,and backs up your call.It is only a jump ball if the official judges that A1 has been prevented from releasing the ball(casebook play 4.25.2).

mick Sat May 10, 2003 09:30am

Quote:

Originally posted by ROMANO
JUMP-BALL!
nothing more to say.

David, David, David ...{<i>sigh!</i>}
Keep reading and keep improving.
Some things are cast in concrete, others are not.
You must use your judgment from time to time, that's the hard part, but that's the reason we get the Big Buck$. ;)

rainmaker Sat May 10, 2003 10:51am

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
I think I'd have called a jump by instinct, but I'm not sure I should have. Probably it would depend on the level. Lower grades such as JH and Freshmen, probably a jump. JV and Varsity, if these are kids with skills and experience, call the travel. But even some JV teams have brand new players who really don't know how to "Play Through."
Your thinking on this intrigues me. I would think that at the lower levels (this was a 7th grade boys game), that calling the travel would be the more "instructive" thing to do. I.e., the kid that didn't take the shot would learn more from the turnover than he would if I had called the jump. Perhaps I don't understand enough about players at this age? [/B]
I wasn't thinking about it from an instructive point of view. I figure that at the lower levels kids aren't as skilled to "play through", in other words to stick to it. They don't have the perspective to see the possibilities. Someone got their hand on it, so the play is over, in their mind. I agree that this isn't a very good way to play, but I'm willing to allow a kid a year or two or three to get past it. So I'm saying I'd call the jump the instant the defender's hand is there and don't give the shooter time to travel. You're rewarding good defense, without penalizing the offense for being weak. They get enough other penalties.

Back In The Saddle Sat May 10, 2003 10:15pm

Quote:

Originally posted by mick
but that's the reason we get the Big Buck$. ;)
You must know something I don't :)

Back In The Saddle Sat May 10, 2003 10:19pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
You're rewarding good defense, without penalizing the offense for being weak. They get enough other penalties.
Okay, I can see the logic in that.

NICK Mon May 12, 2003 04:16am

Seeing that the ball is "briefly touched" and not held I'd call travel.

JeffTheRef Mon May 12, 2003 10:06am

Call it a travel
 
if he traveled. The question is not clearly posed.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1