The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Missed it (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/83319-missed.html)

Rufus Tue Nov 22, 2011 08:32am

Missed it
 
Did a girl's varsity game last night and think I talked myself out of foul call. I'm L table side and the rebound goes to the opposite side of the lane (i.e., outside my area, or so I thought at the time). A1 has good position blocking out B1 and grabs the rebound. Unfortunately I'm straightlined as she's pulling the ball down and I see the B1's arm move and A1's head come forward. I didn't see the contact, however, and A1 didn't go down, drop the ball, or grab her head.

Here are the thoughts that went through my head:
  • It's opposite me and therefore C's call/no-call
  • That being said if I see it go get it (the theory being it's better to have two whistles than none)
  • I didn't see the contact even though there is evidence there was contact
I'm trying hard this season to concentrate on calling only what I see instead of assuming things. I guess I'm looking for judgement criteria you all use for these types of situations. Do you go on severity of the contact? Advantage/disadvantage? Contact is contact, regardless of the impact on the affected player? If the evidence is that there was contact, even if you didn't see it, do you call it?

Thanks in advance.

Raymond Tue Nov 22, 2011 08:40am

If the play is outside of your primary then you most definitely should not be guessing.

Rich Tue Nov 22, 2011 08:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by badnewsref (Post 799553)
if the play is outside of your primary then you most definitely should not be guessing.

+1

stiffler3492 Tue Nov 22, 2011 09:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 799550)
Did a girl's varsity game last night and think I talked myself out of foul call. I'm L table side and the rebound goes to the opposite side of the lane (i.e., outside my area, or so I thought at the time). A1 has good position blocking out B1 and grabs the rebound. Unfortunately I'm straightlined as she's pulling the ball down and I see the B1's arm move and A1's head come forward. I didn't see the contact, however, and A1 didn't go down, drop the ball, or grab her head.

Here are the thoughts that went through my head:
  • It's opposite me and therefore C's call/no-call
  • That being said if I see it go get it (the theory being it's better to have two whistles than none)
  • I didn't see the contact even though there is evidence there was contact
I'm trying hard this season to concentrate on calling only what I see instead of assuming things. I guess I'm looking for judgement criteria you all use for these types of situations. Do you go on severity of the contact? Advantage/disadvantage? Contact is contact, regardless of the impact on the affected player? If the evidence is that there was contact, even if you didn't see it, do you call it?

Thanks in advance.

Let's say this one is in your area. I'd use advantage/disadvantage, unless the contact is severe. Since she didn't lose the ball or fall forward or anything like that, play on.

Raymond Tue Nov 22, 2011 09:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by stiffler3492 (Post 799559)
Let's say this one is in your area. I'd use advantage/disadvantage, unless the contact is severe. Since she didn't lose the ball or fall forward or anything like that, play on.

If the play is in his primary and the contact is to the head then I'm blowing my whistle, advantage or not. Blows to the head tend to leave the recipient a little upset and often can lead to retribution if there is no foul called.

tjones1 Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 799553)
If the play is outside of your primary then you most definitely should not be guessing.

Agree... shouldn't be guessing in your primary either! ;)

Tio Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:19am

Rufus - good job laying off a play you didn't see. We should never "guess" or base a decision on only seeing a part of a play vs. the entire start,develop, finish process. As Lead, I don't think you have an open look on most rebounding plays and should defer to the trail or center depending on who has a clear lane of vision.

On this play it sounds like you did the right thing. On rebounding plays, I call fouls when there is: possession/consequence or cleanup of rough play. From your description of the play there was neither.

twocentsworth Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:59am

agree with others....you should only call what you see. when you guess, your call accuracy decreases significantly (the NBA & NCAA-M numbers/stats kept by each officiating organizations clearly demonstrate that).

Adam Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 799550)
I didn't see the contact even though there is evidence there was contact

(snip)
Advantage/disadvantage? Contact is contact, regardless of the impact on the affected player? If the evidence is that there was contact, even if you didn't see it, do you call it?

If you didn't see the contact, and it didn't affect the play, I wouldn't call it. Double that if you would have to pull the call from your partner's area. Some plays, we have to trust our partner had a better look.

Contact may be contact regardless of effect, but effect normally determines whether it's a foul. Look at the definition of incidental contact.

Rich Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 799581)
If you didn't see the contact, and it didn't affect the play, I wouldn't call it. Double that if you would have to pull the call from your partner's area. Some plays, we have to trust our partner had a better look.

Contact may be contact regardless of effect, but effect normally determines whether it's a foul. Look at the definition of incidental contact.

There are exceptions to this, but that's why they are exceptions.

The human eye isn't quick enough to see a poke to the eye, but if one happens it's pretty obvious. I'm calling a foul. I've probably done this 5 times in the last 7-8 years and nobody's said a word about it.

In 2-person, I've had several times where players will come into my primary where I'm the lead and will go over a foot/leg. It's obvious that this has happened even though I didn't see leg clipping other leg. I'm not talking about someone going down on their own going around a corner sharply, either. This probably happens a handful of times a season and, again, calling that foul yielded the right results -- missing that foul would've yielded worse results.

Anyone who says they only *ever* call what they see and never guess, not even a little bit, is, IMO, being a little short of honest. I do my best on OOB calls, for example, but not every one of those on the end line is an obvious call because of the proximity and the speed of the ball going out. Sometimes the best thing you can give them is an educated guess.

That said, the OP's play is different. There's an official there, the ball's not in the OP's primary, and for all the OP knows, the primary saw the play and decided it wasn't a foul. That's different. Trust your partners unless there's an elephant on the court.

Adam Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:46am

Agreed, but wrt the OP, I'd have a hard time calling something in someone else's primary that I didn't see and didn't affect the play.
You're right, they're exceptions.

Mark Padgett Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:55am

So, how long did Coach A yell at you? :rolleyes:

Rufus Tue Nov 22, 2011 01:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 799590)
So, how long did Coach A yell at you? :rolleyes:

I was wondering when that question would come up. Not very long at all and we moved on with life. I explained that I didn't see contact and wasn't going to call something I didn't see. Naturally that was not satisfactory but I wasn't going to get into a long discussion about it either way.

Thanks for all of your input. While I realize there are no absolutes your feedback has helped me better understand what to consider when the potential exists for calling out of primary.

Adam Tue Nov 22, 2011 01:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 799598)
I was wondering when that question would come up. Not very long at all and we moved on with life. I explained that I didn't see contact and wasn't going to call something I didn't see. Naturally that was not satisfactory but I wasn't going to get into a long discussion about it either way.

Thanks for all of your input. While I realize there are no absolutes your feedback has helped me better understand what to consider when the potential exists for calling out of primary.

I've added, "i'll try to get a better angle next time.". You only get one of these per game, though. You could also note which players blocked your view, if applicable.

just another ref Tue Nov 22, 2011 03:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 799598)
I explained that I didn't see contact and wasn't going to call something I didn't see.

.......I wasn't going to get into a long discussion about it either way.

too late

JRutledge Tue Nov 22, 2011 03:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 799550)
I'm trying hard this season to concentrate on calling only what I see instead of assuming things. I guess I'm looking for judgement criteria you all use for these types of situations. Do you go on severity of the contact? Advantage/disadvantage? Contact is contact, regardless of the impact on the affected player? If the evidence is that there was contact, even if you didn't see it, do you call it?

If you do not see how the contact took place you would do the game a disservice if you just call something. I am not sure what the line above means as all contact is not a foul.

Also if you work long enough you are going to miss more, so do not worry about it. ;)

Peace

Raymond Tue Nov 22, 2011 03:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 799613)
...
Also if you work long enough you are going to miss more, so do not worry about it. ;)

Peace

+1

Worry more about the plays that happened in your primary that you didn't have a whistle on. Those are the ones your supervisor will question YOU on.

BillyMac Tue Nov 22, 2011 06:55pm

Words Of Wisdom ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 799583)
Sometimes the best thing you can give them is an educated guess.

"The best bad call is a really strong bad call." (Our local interpreter)

BillyMac Tue Nov 22, 2011 06:57pm

RichMSN's Words Of Wisdom ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 799583)
Trust your partners unless there's an elephant on the court.

Great line. Don't forget to include the four hundred pound gorilla.

tref Wed Nov 23, 2011 09:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 799583)
There are exceptions to this, but that's why they are exceptions.

The human eye isn't quick enough to see a poke to the eye, but if one happens it's pretty obvious. I'm calling a foul. I've probably done this 5 times in the last 7-8 years and nobody's said a word about it.

In 2-person, I've had several times where players will come into my primary where I'm the lead and will go over a foot/leg. It's obvious that this has happened even though I didn't see leg clipping other leg. I'm not talking about someone going down on their own going around a corner sharply, either. This probably happens a handful of times a season and, again, calling that foul yielded the right results -- missing that foul would've yielded worse results.

Anyone who says they only *ever* call what they see and never guess, not even a little bit, is, IMO, being a little short of honest. I do my best on OOB calls, for example, but not every one of those on the end line is an obvious call because of the proximity and the speed of the ball going out. Sometimes the best thing you can give them is an educated guess.

That said, the OP's play is different. There's an official there, the ball's not in the OP's primary, and for all the OP knows, the primary saw the play and decided it wasn't a foul. That's different. Trust your partners unless there's an elephant on the court.

Amen!! +1

2 person game you're the T & theres a quick steal at midcourt. The 16 year old is going hard to the basket from the right side of the court, you're on the left side & he tries to put it up with the right. You're clearly behind the play & the defender swipes for the ball (a) both of the the shooters hands come straight up or (b) the left hand goes up partially but the right hand doesn't & the body pulls opposite of the direction he driving. Ruling?


Sometimes you HAVE to make an educated guess. You would be surprised at how many educated guesses based on principles the worlds best make on a night to night basis. Our eyes cannot see everything that happens on the court. After all, our eyes only see what our mind tellls them we should be looking for. Gotta have a "feel for the game!"

tref Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 799583)
There are exceptions to this, but that's why they are exceptions.

The human eye isn't quick enough to see a poke to the eye, but if one happens it's pretty obvious. I'm calling a foul. I've probably done this 5 times in the last 7-8 years and nobody's said a word about it.

In 2-person, I've had several times where players will come into my primary where I'm the lead and will go over a foot/leg. It's obvious that this has happened even though I didn't see leg clipping other leg. I'm not talking about someone going down on their own going around a corner sharply, either. This probably happens a handful of times a season and, again, calling that foul yielded the right results -- missing that foul would've yielded worse results.

Anyone who says they only *ever* call what they see and never guess, not even a little bit, is, IMO, being a little short of honest. I do my best on OOB calls, for example, but not every one of those on the end line is an obvious call because of the proximity and the speed of the ball going out. Sometimes the best thing you can give them is an educated guess.

That said, the OP's play is different. There's an official there, the ball's not in the OP's primary, and for all the OP knows, the primary saw the play and decided it wasn't a foul. That's different. Trust your partners unless there's an elephant on the court.

Amen!! +1

2 person game you're the T & theres a quick steal at midcourt. The 16 year old is going hard to the basket from the right side of the court, you're on the left side & he tries to put it up with the right. You're clearly behind the play & the defender swipes for the ball (a) both of the the shooters hands come straight up or (b) the left hand goes up partially but the right hand doesn't & the body pulls opposite of the direction he driving. Ruling?


Sometimes you HAVE to make an educated guess. You would be surprised at how many educated guesses based on principles the worlds best make on a night to night basis. Our eyes cannot see everything that happens on the court. After all, our eyes only see what our mind tellls them we should be looking for. Gotta have a "feel for the game!"


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1