CSU-UNLV

[JRutledge]

Originally posted by rockyroad

I have gone back over everything I posted on this topic, and I can not find anythplace where I said they were unrelated or not the same action...I have stated over and over that they were the same play...and nowhere did I say that the foul being called would have stopped the injury - that's assinine...what I have been trying to say is that the lack of a foul call combined with the injury put CSU at a tremendous disadvantage...in my humble opinion, it was a foul...in my humble opinion, CSU got screwed...not a CSU fan - that was the first time I had seen them play all year...

I only wanted to know what the two had to do with each other. Foul call or no foul call, the player got injured. If that appears to you that CSU got screwed, only because a foul was not called, then so be it. They won the game, so whatever happen it motivated them to play without this so called top player. And if all you were saying is that injury put them at a disadvantage, well DUH!!!! The game was not won or lost on that incident. But you will claim it does I guess.

Peace