Well, Tee is certainly terse and blunt. But the deceased certainly does not seem to have been one of the good guys in officiating. (And why is it still unseemly to "speak ill of the dead"?)
The use of the word "apparent" can get across the meaning while leaving ajar the door to judgment.
Adam
Thu Aug 18, 2011 09:54am
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
(Post 781772)
Well, Tee is certainly terse and blunt. But the deceased certainly does not seem to have been one of the good guys in officiating. (And why is it still unseemly to "speak ill of the dead"?)
I was responding to his commentary about the forum.
JRutledge
Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:35am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
(Post 781744)
I was confused as well.
While I don't like Tim C's "style" in just throwing the word 'murderer' out there, a quick search turned up the following:
And I know where Tim was going, but this is why I did not get the reason he concluded we are talking about a person as a murderer. My confusion has nothing to do with Tim's style.
Quote:
Tim Holifield, a Montgomery County constable, said that Raymond hasn't been named a suspect in his 41-year-old wife's killing and it's premature to connect their deaths.
"At this point, to call him anything other than a person of interest post-mortem would be unfair and improper," Holifield said.
Peace
mbyron
Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:55am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
(Post 781780)
I was responding to his commentary about the forum.
