Debunking the "over the back" myth

[Paul LeBoutillier]

I'm not saying we don't need to be knowledgable about the rulebook, but do we really need to split this hair?

With all due respect, I don't think this is a matter of merely splitting hairs. "Over-the-back" is believed by MANY people to be a legitimate foul and they ASSUME it's in the rulebook. Perpetuating that misconception doesn't make sense.