The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 81
NFHS: I was watching the varsity game after my JV game yesterday and on several plays where there was incidental contact(one time a collision) and then when the official passed on a block/charge call; the official used a signal that looked like the "not closely guarded" mechanic. I asked him about this in post game and he said he wanted to make it clear that he saw the play and was ruling the contact legal.
I'm wondering if other officials use this "technique" and if I should?
I believe this signal is not even approved for NFHS in legitimate "not closely guarded" situations let alone for these other plays?

thanks
GTW

__________________
A poor shooter is always open - John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 778
It isn't approved in any situation, you are correct. I do not use it, but I wouldn't condemn using it either, the idea is to communicate and this is another form of communication. I have also seen it used by some D1 officials. I think the problem is some officials will use it to bail themselves out, see something, don't have the sack to make a call so they give that signal, could definitely get old fast.
__________________
Church Basketball "The brawl that begins with a prayer"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 12:30pm
9 times
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 777
I think sometimes that when this is used it looks more like "I have no idea what to do" than "this is a no call." This is from the body language that the official uses. I wouldn't condemn anyone for using it, but careful what message it conveys if you choose to use it.
__________________
Get it right!

1999 (2x), 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2019
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
I don't use it. If a partner used it, I wouldn't care... but to me any "extra" signals are just copouts.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 188
I place this with baseball's "foul tip" call used by basketball refs. While it's meant to convey a thought, it's used in a haphazard, arbitrary way. One ref's no-call signal doesn't exactly convey the same meaning as the next ref's no-call signal.

Also, the official mechanics we use seemed to be designed specifically to convey information to the players and or the table. These extra homemade signals some officials use are for the crowd and coaches.

I don’t think made-up mechanics have a place on the varsity floor but don’t gripe if others feel the need to use them. A withheld whistle is a no-call until you shrug your shoulders at the same time. Then it’s a mistake.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1