The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 08:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Saw this on ESPN.com this morning. Check out http://espn.go.com/ncb/news/2003/0128/1500271.html where the Big 12 (and -- surprise, surprise -- Bobby Knight) is blaming a timer for a Texas Tech loss at Oklahoma.

Chuck
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 09:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 521
From the ESPN article: “The videotape review also indicated the slow start of the clock at the 4.5-seconds mark may have happened because the clock operator's view of ball contact was blocked by players on the court. Still, the clock was slow in starting, Weiberg said.”

In situations like this it is very important for the official, to have good line-of-sight with the clock operator. It is most important that the chop be very distinctive and forceful.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 09:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 555
Send a message via ICQ to bigwhistle
Quote:
Originally posted by RecRef
From the ESPN article: “The videotape review also indicated the slow start of the clock at the 4.5-seconds mark may have happened because the clock operator's view of ball contact was blocked by players on the court. Still, the clock was slow in starting, Weiberg said.”

In situations like this it is very important for the official, to have good line-of-sight with the clock operator. It is most important that the chop be very distinctive and forceful.

While you are right about the mechanics needed, I sure hope that you are not naive enough to think that the timer is watching the official in this situation. You know that 99.9% of the timers will be watching the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 10:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harwinton, CT
Posts: 324
-----------------------------------------------------------
After Tech's Will Chavis hit two free throws and on the subsequent in-bounds pass to Price, the second timing error occurred when the clock started late by approximately 0.5 seconds.
-----------------------------------------------------------

0.5 seconds ???? don't they assume the 1 second lag for the timer starting and stoping the clock...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 30, 2003, 10:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by cmckenna
-----------------------------------------------------------
After Tech's Will Chavis hit two free throws and on the subsequent in-bounds pass to Price, the second timing error occurred when the clock started late by approximately 0.5 seconds.
-----------------------------------------------------------

0.5 seconds ???? don't they assume the 1 second lag for the timer starting and stoping the clock...
NCAA has no lag time, and the FED has it only for STOPPING the clock (not for starting it).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1