|
|||
Please explain the "hand is part of the ball" rule and all of its implications, including when there is contact made by a defender with the hand of someone holding the ball and when there is contact with the hand of a shooter by a defender's hand. There is lots of argument over this within our group of "old guys" that play several times each week. Thanks
|
|
|||
Rule 4-24-2. The exact terminology is "It is legal use of hands to reach or block or slap the ball controlled by a dribbler or a player throwing for goal or a player holding it,and accidentaly hitting the hand of the opponent when it is in contact with the ball". In other words,it isn't a foul.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I think that that's a dumb rule. Why is it legal to slap the hand??? Under FIBA rules it's illegal, and I think that that's fine, cause how can someone shoot a decent shot if he's hit on the hand??
ADR
__________________
"Don't criticize what you don't understand, son. You never walked in that man's shoes." - Elvis often used this adaptation of a well-known quotation. And now, I do so as well... |
|
|||
Quote:
How can you tell if the hand was hit or the ball was hit? Remember we are not only talking about shots but also while holding the ball and while dribbling. |
|
|||
Stating the obvious.
The hand is part of the ball when it is ON THE BALL.
Slapping the dribbler or shooter's hand when it is not on the ball and that leads to a fumble or an interrupted dribble probably needs to be called as a foul. If the shooter has the ball above his head contact on the hand very often includes contact on the arm, on the body, and sometimes a defender's foot in the shooter's pocket - well, where a pocket would be located if uniforms had pockets. This contact is often called a foul also.
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford |
|
|||
Quote:
Wouldn't this affect the follow through? Dude |
|
|||
Re: Which rule book, or does it matter?
Quote:
|
|
|||
followthrough smallothru
After the ball is gone, hitting the hand will not affect the flight of the ball - shot will still be made or missed on it's own merits.
If this hand-to-hand contact is the total contact and it was a valid attempt to block the shot, I'm not going to call a foul (I think I see your point. The shooter's hand is not in contact with the ball yet I'm not going to call a foul.) I rarely see hand-to-hand contact during the act of shooting without some other contact. In my opinion, if the defender, in his effort to reach the ball, makes other bodily contact, he has been beaten and he should be whistled for the excessive contact with the shooter. Of course you would have to see the play to call it.
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
I would only add that it won't affect this particular shot, just as the blocking foul on an irborn shooter after release of the ball does not affect that shot. If not called, may it affect the follow through on future shots?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|