![]() |
Quote:
|
The points in the paint stats was bull****.
If you go back to about the 10:30 mark in the first half, Andrew Smith hit a turnaround jumper that put Butler's point total to 11. Clark Kellogg even noted at that time that it was an important development to get Butler on the board in the paint early in the game. For them to later say that points in the paint was 18-0 was crap. |
Quote:
|
Amen brother!
Quote:
|
Quote:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VPFMf3VVOuM?hd=1" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" width="640"></iframe> |
Quote:
NCAA Championship Game 2011: Watch Horrible Non-Call in Ugly Title Game | Bleacher Report |
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U3weWo6QWbA?hd=1" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" width="640"></iframe>
Is this a RSBQ play that needs to be gotten...what about the contact by the dribbler at the end of the drive? |
Quote:
|
Was to post this play:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/f-G8IoayUq4?hd=1" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" width="640"></iframe> |
RSBQ: That is usually called in most games. Not sure why it wasn't.
Incidental Contact: I don't really see anything other than an ugly play. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Rsbq
Quote:
Nothing at the end of the play. |
Incidental contact
Quote:
From this angle you can't see if A1 pushed B1 or if B1 just stumbled on his own. |
I stated in the chat room last night that Butler need to shoot 38% from 3pt range in order to win. They were 9/33 = 27%. Had they made four of those 3pt shots which they missed they would have been 13/33 = 39% and scored 12 more points. Guess what? They lost by 12.
So I was darn close. They would have needed to shoot a bit over 39% and that would have only gotten them even, so they would have also needed to make one of the several FTs which they missed. Overall, not a bad prediction. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06pm. |