The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Good block? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/62013-good-block.html)

Loudwhistle2 Wed Feb 09, 2011 01:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 727955)
I do not have to prove anything to you. It is not a foul at the levels I work. If you want to call that, go right ahead. But you will be suspect if you call that where I work and not expect some body contact on blocked shots. Never been reprimanded for not calling this a foul.

Peace

You're right you don't have to prove anything to me. I only reff HS V all the way down to 3-4 grade, not varsity elementary, just third grade and fourth grade. If I passed on that foul in any kind of HS game I would be reprimanded for not making this call.

JRutledge Wed Feb 09, 2011 01:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loudwhistle2 (Post 727998)
You're right you don't have to prove anything to me. I only reff HS V all the way down to 3-4 grade, not varsity elementary, just third grade and fourth grade. If I passed on that foul in any kind of HS game I would be reprimanded for not making this call.

OK. :p

Peace

eyezen Wed Feb 09, 2011 01:40pm

Might call the foul, but only due to the arm hitting the head. But I would have no issues with those that don't have a whistle for a foul.

RookieDude Wed Feb 09, 2011 01:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 727872)
It is real simple. Call what is expected in your area. That is what I am going to do. This is not a foul for me at any level, not with the players I see.

Peace

Rut...that is because you are getting NBA philosophies at your NFHS meetings.;)

M&M Guy Wed Feb 09, 2011 01:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyezen (Post 728171)
But I would have no issues with those that don't have a whistle for a foul.

While I do understand the reasoning behind not calling the foul - (discounting the contact on the head) the contact didn't cause the blocked shot, and neither player was going to retrieve the ball before going OOB - would it make a difference if there was another defender standing right along the endline, and they managed to catch the ball before it went OOB? Now the ball remains live, and one team has a 5-on-4 until the player who was knocked OOB gets up and rejoins the play. Does that change anyone's opinion from a no-call to a foul?

Amesman Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 728175)
While I do understand the reasoning behind not calling the foul - (discounting the contact on the head) the contact didn't cause the blocked shot, and neither player was going to retrieve the ball before going OOB - would it make a difference if there was another defender standing right along the endline, and they managed to catch the ball before it went OOB? Now the ball remains live, and one team has a 5-on-4 until the player who was knocked OOB gets up and rejoins the play. Does that change anyone's opinion from a no-call to a foul?

There you go, getting logical again, M&M.

By the way, thought I'd finally get to see you Sunday ... was watching the Super Bowl and during one of the commercials I went to grab something to eat and my wife called out, "Hey, look, there's that M&M Guy again." No striped shirt, though. :D

JRutledge Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RookieDude (Post 728174)
Rut...that is because you are getting NBA philosophies at your NFHS meetings.;)

Wrong. Everything someone does is not about the NBA. I do not see this called in Men's basketball.

Peace

JRutledge Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 728175)
While I do understand the reasoning behind not calling the foul - (discounting the contact on the head) the contact didn't cause the blocked shot, and neither player was going to retrieve the ball before going OOB - would it make a difference if there was another defender standing right along the endline, and they managed to catch the ball before it went OOB? Now the ball remains live, and one team has a 5-on-4 until the player who was knocked OOB gets up and rejoins the play. Does that change anyone's opinion from a no-call to a foul?

No it does not change anything I feel about the play. The player fell because he had a defender block his shot. Not necessarily because of contact afterward. Players fall and we do not call fouls all the time. That is not the reason to call a foul or not call a foul.

Peace

M&M Guy Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amesman (Post 728178)
There you go, getting logical again, M&M.

By the way, thought I'd finally get to see you Sunday ... was watching the Super Bowl and during one of the commercials I went to grab something to eat and my wife called out, "Hey, look, there's that M&M Guy again." No striped shirt, though. :D

It sucks - I get no residuals from those commercials either... :D

RookieDude Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 728180)
Wrong. Everything someone does is not about the NBA. I do not see this called in Men's basketball.

Peace

...how about in BOYS basketball? ;)

JRutledge Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RookieDude (Post 728194)
...how about in BOYS basketball? ;)

What do I work the most of?

Peace

Amesman Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 728190)
It sucks - I get no residuals from those commercials either... :D

Never knew you were so, uh, young looking for having all those years in officiating, too. Or that you were from Detroit?

M&M Guy Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 728184)
No it does not change anything I feel about the play. The player fell because he had a defender block his shot. Not necessarily because of contact afterward. Players fall and we do not call fouls all the time. That is not the reason to call a foul or not call a foul.

Peace

Well, then maybe we saw the play differently; I thought the block was clean, but the body contact forced the player to fall OOB. If you saw it differently, I'm not going to argue as it was outside my area. ;)

Of course players fall all the time without a foul needing to be called. I was simply trying to address some of the comments where it was pointed out since the block was clean, and the ball was going OOB anyway, there's no advantage gained from the contact, so it's a no-call. I'm just wondering how how long one should wait in determining when there really is an advantage from the contact before blowing the whistle?

RookieDude Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 728196)
What do I work the most of?

Peace

I have no idea...Men's (NCAA) or Boy's (NFHS)?

I'm just having fun with ya Rut...many pretty good officials here said they would call this play a foul in NFHS. I tend to agree...of course we have the benefit of instant replay and not just a bang bang reaction during the game.

If you were to pass on this play in one of our HS games...I probably wouldn't think twice about it.

Rich Wed Feb 09, 2011 02:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 728184)
No it does not change anything I feel about the play. The player fell because he had a defender block his shot. Not necessarily because of contact afterward. Players fall and we do not call fouls all the time. That is not the reason to call a foul or not call a foul.

Peace

I'm with you on this one. A play like this is only going to happen in a boys game and as the L, I'm merely calling the OOB.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1