Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

I misread; I read it that they were skipping the notification entirely.

It's modifying "free" and "timeout". Coaches can call the players over, but on the first horn, I'm in the huddle telling the coach I need a sub NOW. That usually means I'm right in there, since notifying the player usually takes about 5 seconds. The coach doesn't want that second horn going off before a player is at the table. That's the key difference, to me -- I will give a little leeway on timeouts because we have the resumption of play procedure if I need it.

An 'interval of time' is how my past interpreter put it.

Was his redundancy deliberate?

Would you repeat the question?

Why do I keep getting dragged into these things? :confused:

Oh, wait, never mind.

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post. :D

I know. I gotta get better at reading the entire thread. I'm pretty quick to hit reply when I see something directed at me,

cheers