DQ Procedure
 

So I've had a few disqualifications in my recent games, and I want to get the procedure right.

Tweet! Foul on White 2-4, 2 shots.

Buzzer! Scorer tells me that that's 5 fouls on white 24.

What happens next???

Notify head coach, then notify player. Then have the timer give you 20 seconds on the clock.

Get them out

Ok. Is the other team allowed to huddle by the bench during these 20 seconds?

Why wouldn't they be?

Also, don't forget to tell your partner(s). It's important that the entire crew know this player is gone and can't come back in.

Does anyone have the non-calling official inform the coach of the 5th foul on #24?

1. Notify partners
2. Notify head coach
3. Start clock
4. If needed, notify player

Why would you?

Because it's not a time-out. So the players may huddle with the head coach if they wish, but technically no one else is allowed to be standing.

Our HS assignors instruct us to do so. To be honest, I usually play the "Who Is Closer" game. More often than not it is the calling official.

Good point, I was assuming the question was regarding the players on the court and not the bench.

Do you still allow the coach the 20 second replacement period if he has no replacements available on the bench? :confused:

Because in 2-man, the NFHS Officials Manual requires the non-calling official to notify the coach and the player.

http://www.1tell2.com/images/obamanomics/horshack.jpg

Ooh, ooh, I know.

+1

We usually switch to have the non-calling official notify the HC and start the clock, etc.

Scrappy does too. Sooooooo.......

Shut up. :D

Looks like my partner from a week ago. For every chop, his arm was this high and against his head, very comical.

NOtify your partners, first. Otherwise, they'll have a tendancy to administer the FTs.

Did he have the same kind of hat?

Snaq, I think he's making fun of your hat.

Epstein's mother says to shut up.

Your lips are moving.

It's coach, then clock, then player. Otherwise, you're giving the coach time not warranted. The 20 seconds is *not* a free timeout -- we *are* going to be ready to go with a sub by the second horn.

Manual or no manual, we (me and the people I work with) notify the coach on our own DQ fouls in our games here.

Is there some sort of penalty for not being ready after the 20 second period?

10-5-2

Had this discussion today at our Christmas meeting. The executive stated that if it's an obvious DQ and it's not a close game and the coach is already getting ready to sub his player not to waste time by not having non-calling official come over and do the notification. This is especially helpful if your association is ignoring the FED mechanic and still switches on every foul.

Case book play 10.5.2SitB(c) + what Snaqs cited

Rookie Officials Take Note ...
 

Just want to confirm that the word "not" is modifying the word "timeout". RichMSN is correct. Do not treat this like a timeout. There are important differences in terms of allowing substitutions during this time interval. The "warning" horn has a different meaning here.

Sounds like they're just asking for trouble here.

Like what?

My pregame usually includes "if a team is fouling at the end of the game to stop the clock, and everyone knows it, just stay there and deal with it. If there's any controversy, go away and let someone else handle the DQ."

Of course, I did have a T in this situation earlier this year.

I misread; I read it that they were skipping the notification entirely.

It's modifying "free" and "timeout". Coaches can call the players over, but on the first horn, I'm in the huddle telling the coach I need a sub NOW. That usually means I'm right in there, since notifying the player usually takes about 5 seconds. The coach doesn't want that second horn going off before a player is at the table. That's the key difference, to me -- I will give a little leeway on timeouts because we have the resumption of play procedure if I need it.

An 'interval of time' is how my past interpreter put it.

Was his redundancy deliberate?

Would you repeat the question?

Why do I keep getting dragged into these things? :confused:

Oh, wait, never mind.

In Ontario the Provincial Association decided last year to ignore the FED mechanic change that happened last year and to switch on every foul and the trail on FT is opposite- just like it used to be prior to 2009.

Does that make more sense?

Yes, but it has nothing to do with how I misread your post. :D

I know. I gotta get better at reading the entire thread. I'm pretty quick to hit reply when I see something directed at me,

cheers