![]() |
An Experiment
Had a game the other week where I had a 5-second call on an in-bounds play. As I was running by the bench, coach said "Felt like your count was a little fast."
So, that night, I went home and did an experiment to time my count. I used a stopwatch, started it, and without looking at it, did a 10-second count. Come to find out, if anything, my count is too slow, by about a second and a half. So, last Saturday, I recorded a few college basketball games and used my stopwatch to time a few officials' counts. Some officials were taking two whole seconds to make one count. :eek: Almost everyone's counts were too slow. I did the same at a few high school games that I observed this week. Same result. Most officials take between 1.25 to 2 seconds to make one count. Try it. Take a stopwatch, start it, do a 10-second count as you would during the game, and stop the stopwatch. Look at the result. Whatcha got??? When I did it, I got 13 seconds. |
When I first started I had a senior official tell me that every now and then when there's no pressure in the backcourt to take a peak at the clock as you're counting to get a feel for what the right timing speed should be. I still do it every now and again and it has helped me keep a pretty steady count. Not that it's perfect of course.....:o
|
You might want to consider the source, Fiasco. That coach is unhappy with losing the ball. His desire to be objective does not equate yours.
Case in point from today: My partner hands the ball to a player for a front-court endline throw-in. The coach continues to shout instructions to that player, who is trying to listen to his coach. Meanwhile, the count goes on, and I'm sensing a five-second violation coming. I'm right. The coach, who was so caught up in his instructions and probably didn't pay attention to the count, exclaims, "that was a pretty fast five seconds!" Sometimes, not everyone is paying attention to the same things we are. |
And if you're going to err, it's best to be on the slow side. It would be pretty embarassing to make a 10 second back court violation call when only 7 or 8 seconds have run off the clock.
|
Now I know why a 10-sec. BC usually ends up with the 35-sec. shot clock showing 22-24 seconds. :eek:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As stated by the shot clock instructions
The ball is legally touched by a player inbounds. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Snaq, I was seeing the meaning.
Unfortunately how many coaches see it the same way as officials? Most coaches think 10-secs. off the clock in the BC=Violation. I seen a couple of situations like that last year where the shot clock went from 35 to 25 & no FC status with the coach requesting a violation be called. Generally I've noticed there's about 1-2 sec. difference between the clock & the official's count. Quote:
|
I love doing this test when training new officials. Have them all line up, close their eyes, and begin the 10 second count. It is amazing to see the differences...and you are right. The majority take 15-20 seconds.
|
Quote:
And that's usually what I tell a coach when he says that to me. |
Been There, Done That ...
Quote:
|
Just had my son test me on a 10 count backcourt count. 10.05 seconds.
Happy times... Now if I could get that spin move in the post called correctly every time... |
Quote:
And how do you know the clock was started properly? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37am. |