The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Loud Slap (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/58082-loud-slap.html)

Adam Tue May 11, 2010 11:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 676391)
That's what I think. If you don't call it, you could be sending a message that you condone it.

Slapping at the ball is usually risky, because you might make contact with something else other than the hand. If B1 did this, you have nothing to ponder.

Just playing devil's advocate, but who are we to want the players to turn and run back downcourt on defense? I'd be just as happy if he stopped slapping at the ball, but that's allowed too, so why should I want it to stop?

bainsey Tue May 11, 2010 12:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 676396)
Just playing devil's advocate, but who are we to want the players to turn and run back downcourt on defense?

Where'd you get that idea? I was only talking about the risks of slapping.

GoodwillRef Tue May 11, 2010 12:07pm

Call the foul...they get 5 of them.

Adam Tue May 11, 2010 12:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 676397)
Where'd you get that idea? I was only talking about the risks of slapping.

Maybe from this exchange?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffpea (Post 676387)
When you call this a foul, players quickly learn NOT to do that (slap/grab/etc) and simply run back down court on defense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 676391)
That's what I think. If you don't call it, you could be sending a message that you condone it.

Slapping at the ball is usually risky, because you might make contact with something else other than the hand. If B1 did this, you have nothing to ponder.


Adam Tue May 11, 2010 12:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodwillRef (Post 676400)
Call the foul...they get 5 of them.

But by rule, it's not a foul. Why would you call it and penalize the offense?

Smitty Tue May 11, 2010 12:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodwillRef (Post 676400)
Call the foul...they get 5 of them.

Why is it a foul? If you intend to move up to varsity ball, you have to let this go.

bainsey Tue May 11, 2010 12:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 676404)
Maybe from this exchange?

Jeff said "run down the court." I was only referring to the slap.

Jurassic Referee Tue May 11, 2010 12:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 676376)
1) Let's leave the face out of it, as I'm calling a slap in the face unless the dribbler is in the process of blowing by the defender for a layup.

2)A slap on the wrist that doesn't cause any hinderance to the offensive player is incidental contact <font color = red>most of the time</font>. Same as a slap on the arm or leg.
<font color = red>Now, in practice, we may have to get this sometimes in the open court.</font>

1) Say what? Even if your patient whistle tells you that no advantage was gained by the slap in the face and the dribbler's RSBQ wasn't disrupted?

2) Bingo! Most but not all of the time it may not be a foul. But there are times when you still have to go and get it. There are situations where that slap on the wrist is no different than a slap in the face for all intents and purposes.


'Tis a funny game to have to call sometimes. It's awful tough to place absolutes on any particular genre of foul.

Good points imo, Snaqs, and I certainly agree with you.

Adam Tue May 11, 2010 01:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 676416)
1) Say what? Even if your patient whistle tells you that no advantage was gained by the slap in the face and the dribbler's RSBQ wasn't disrupted?

Yep, see below.... :D
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 676416)
2) Bingo! Most but not all of the time it may not be a foul. But there are times when you still have to go and get it. There are situations where that slap on the wrist is no different than a slap in the face for all intents and purposes.


'Tis a funny game to have to call sometimes. It's awful tough to place absolutes on any particular genre of foul.

Good points imo, Snaqs, and I certainly agree with you.


JRutledge Tue May 11, 2010 01:34pm

I will not ever call a foul based on what I hear. I only call fouls on what I see. If the slap caused a disadvantage, then it should be called, not just because you hear skin coming together. And I do not agree about sending a message. I only call what I fell is illegal, not what I think is illegal because I "think" I hear something. What if the slap was while the ball was on the hand? That is not a foul according to the rules. :)

Peace

Tio Tue May 11, 2010 01:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 676426)
I will not ever call a foul based on what I hear. I only call fouls on what I see. If the slap caused a disadvantage, then it should be called, not just because you hear skin coming together. And I do not agree about sending a message. I only call what I fell is illegal, not what I think is illegal because I "think" I hear something. What if the slap was while the ball was on the hand? That is not a foul according to the rules. :)

Peace

Amen to this. I think most of us have assumed (maybe incorrectly) that the whack occurred and was seen & heard by the whole gym. I agree though, we can't guess and have to see the foul versus make an assumption based on what we hear.

Adam Tue May 11, 2010 01:47pm

I think the point of the OP is that you see the slap, it doesn't really affect anything, but everyone in the gym can hear it. It's so loud it makes Jonny stop playing with his diaper and look at the ref waiting for a call.

Higher levels of basketball expect this to get let go. Lower levels, it may be different.

bas2456 Tue May 11, 2010 02:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 676430)
I think the point of the OP is that you see the slap, it doesn't really affect anything, but everyone in the gym can hear it. It's so loud it makes Jonny stop playing with his diaper and look at the ref waiting for a call.

Higher levels of basketball expect this to get let go. Lower levels, it may be different.

Why is this?

Rut, in the OP I might have left out the fact that I saw the contact, and it definitely was NOT on the hand, which both of A1's hands were on the ball.

Adam Tue May 11, 2010 02:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bas2456 (Post 676437)
Why is this?

Simple, lower level ball is played, coached, and administered (usually) by people with less experience. The higher you get, the more the players and coaches realize the ramifciations of "not all contact is a foul." It's at the same level coaches start to realize why it's not a foul when their point guard gets his leg slapped as he blows by the defender.

It's at the same level I had a coach get mad because I called a foul on the other team, taking a layup away from his team.

bas2456 Tue May 11, 2010 02:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 676438)
Simple, lower level ball is played, coached, and administered (usually) by people with less experience. The higher you get, the more the players and coaches realize the ramifciations of "not all contact is a foul." It's at the same level coaches start to realize why it's not a foul when their point guard gets his leg slapped as he blows by the defender.

It's at the same level I had a coach get mad because I called a foul on the other team, taking a layup away from his team.

So then what's wrong with applying the advantage/disadvantage principle earlier, so that more people learn sooner?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1