Point of Interruption
I find I question if I apply the two of these correctly sometimes. Is there a simple way to keep POI and the AP straight. I understand that sometime the AP is the POI in cases where no team control exists.
Sit: A1 on fast break. B1 comes from behind and bats ball out of bounds. Coach goes nuts and has been, So I wack him prior to giving A ball for a throw in on the endline. Shoot two at other end and give A1 there throw in on endline. Did I apply the rule correctly? Is there a live ball dead ball way of looking at POI in general. |
If we're talking NFHS, this is not a POI situation.
|
Were you officiating with NCAA rules or High school rules? If high school, a single T is never POI. It's always enforced with a throwin for the non-offending team.
To answer your question: POI is always, essentially, whatever you were doing or about to do. In the case of an OOB violation followed by a double foul, you'll simply administer the throwin you would have done without the double foul. Or free throw. Or, if there was team control, go to that. There aren't many situations where POI will be the arrow. |
Quote:
Yes NF. So your saying it should have been two shots and the ball at half court for B? Would it have changed things if I wack him after A1 has ball on the endline for the throw in. |
Quote:
Quote:
We've "always" used it on IWs and CEs, so those aren't really an issue. And, there's rarely a simultaneous foul. So, that leaves only double fouls. That's not hard to remember. |
Got it. Anytime there is a single technical foul as in my situation. Two shots and the ball at half court for the non affending team.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03am. |