Called 2 Shots - Should Have Been 1-and-1
Foul. Officials tell the boys its two shots but it should be one-and-one.
A1 misses the FT. A2 rebounds it and puts it back in while B players stand and watch. Not correctable, correct? Didn't let them shoot an unmerited FT. Didn't deny them a FT. Officials blew the whistle after A2 scored. Waved it off. Went AP. Thoughts? |
8.6.1
Takes a little judgement but not much. As I understand your OP, the officials got it correct. |
Quote:
If "everyone" moved, then play on. |
Correct. This is not a correctable error because it was caused by misinformation from the officials.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is what I was told by the varsity officials watching the game at this point. Since only one player went in, there is obvious advantage/disadvantage here due to mis-information given. You go to the arrow in this case. |
Quote:
The only precedent for canceling a score made due to a missed call is a throw-in violation following a score. This needs to be blown dead immediately to avoid this. |
Quote:
Another one of them Nevada things, maybe? |
Quote:
I'm not so sure he was alone on this one. He had a point, IMO. |
Quote:
I'm with pretty much everybody else. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But what is the difference between a late whistle and this scenario. I know one difference is a violation versus a mistake by the officials. But 8.6.1 gives us a definite time when we are to blow the play dead (when one team is at an obvious disadvantage due to our misinforming players.) If we fail to whistle before a quick put back, I think it is well within the rules to whistle late and follow the case book play 8.6.1. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41pm. |