|
Small tidbit here, but rather than thinking of this as "overturning" an oob call, I like to think of it as adding additional information. After that it's the calling official's decision on which way we go.
|
Quote:
If there's a marginal bump and the ball shoots out of bounds some officials will simply call the out of bounds violation and life goes on (in the middle of the floor there's no leeway -- loss of possession due to contact and it's going to be called a foul). Some are for it, some are against it, few are stupid enough to try to explain that to a coach. Silence can't be misquoted. |
Quote:
Why do we have some many different ways to cover a simple procedure…blow your whistle and come offer the information you have...if you partner wants to change his/her call fine...if not fine. By not blowing your whistle both teams may already be at the other end of the floor and then your partner overturns his call and we have to gather up all 10 players and bring them back down to the right end of the court. Giving your partner the "stop sign" can give the appearance that you are not working as a team and that you are unapproachable. |
Quote:
In this case, I'd simply stop doing it and start calling the fouls. I might even be inclined to change the initial call to a foul on B1 (assuming I remembered B1's number). |
Thanks for the info
Rich and Snaq,
Thanks for the info. I'm not sure if I like it or not. My gut reaction is that I'm not a fan of passing on a foul. However, I could be convinced otherwise when I start calling games myself. Correct me if I am wrong. A summary of your feedback is that the practice is not really supported by rule, but is a mechanic or technique to manage the flow of the game. Many, if not most, assigners or evaluators expect the technique to be used. So it is used. Has anyone ever come accross an assignor or evaluator that specifically did not support the technique? |
I don't want to speak for "most" areas, so I don't know how widely used it is. I can tell you the feedback I've gotten from the more senior refs in my association (the refs I've been told to listen to) on both formal evaluations and informal discussions has been to use this.
Now, there are two scenarios where this happens. 1. White contacts blue in the process of the ball going out of bounds off of white. 2. White contacts blue in the process of the ball going out of bounds off of blue. 1 may not actually be a foul, due to the advantage being negated by the ball going OOB. This is a legitimate no-call by rule. 2 is more sketchy by rule, but there are some locales where it's expected on slight contact that should, by rule, be a foul due to the result of the play. |
Quote:
Correct, that's why I don't blow my whistle when providing additional information. IMHO, blowing your whistle gives the perception your making the call, not your partner. It implies a disagreement. In another scenario, If I'm not sure on a call, I blow whistle, raise hand, and look for help. Partner never blows in this situation either. In both cases it shows we're a team, and there is no alpha male in the group. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't need a whistle to let people know you are talking because you ARE talking, they can see that. Perception is reality, you blow your whistle after your partner blows his, crowd, coaches are now looking for you to overide everything. Bad precedent IMO I would only blow if partner didn't see me and that could happen especially in two man if we're going the other way. That said, as a rule, I don't like to blow for reasons in previous post. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05pm. |