The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Delay of Game Warning?? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/56377-delay-game-warning.html)

mbyron Tue Jan 12, 2010 02:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 650521)
Never let it be said that I won't admit when I'm wrong.

Are you admitting that you're wrong? Or you just don't want people saying that?

Adam Tue Jan 12, 2010 02:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 650697)
Are you admitting that you're wrong?

Yes, now stop rubbing it in.

mbyron Tue Jan 12, 2010 04:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 650701)
Yes, now stop rubbing it in.

Touchy. Or is that touché? :D

Rich Tue Jan 12, 2010 04:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 650779)
Touchy. Or is that touché? :D

How about tuchis?

mbyron Wed Jan 13, 2010 08:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 650785)
How about tuchis?

Too obscure. :D

bob jenkins Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 650921)
Too obscure. :D


How much weight has Rich lost for his tuchis to be obscure. ;)

CMHCoachNRef Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 650105)
Had a play a couple of years ago where, with about 4 or 5 seconds left, the trailing team hit a three to close within 1 point; but they were out of timeouts.

They tried stepping out of bounds to draw the DOG warning, but my partner (lead) rightly ignored it.

Coach just shrugged his shoulders as the clock ran out.

Snaqs,
Just curious. In this situation, Team A (the team I coach :)) has just made the three to pull within one. Shockingly :eek:, I failed to keep a timeout for such a situation and only have "Webers" left. But, seeing that there are under five seconds remaining, I IMMEDIATELY and LOUDLY signal for a timeout, knowing that it will result in a technical foul. If the ball is still in the net on its downward flight, are you going to grant this timeout? If not, what is your rule reference for ignoring it?

Jurassic Referee Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CMHCoachNRef (Post 650961)
Snaqs,
Just curious. In this situation, Team A (the team I coach :)) has just made the three to pull within one. Shockingly :eek:, I failed to keep a timeout for such a situation and only have "Webers" left. But, seeing that there are under five seconds remaining, I IMMEDIATELY and LOUDLY signal for a timeout, knowing that it will result in a technical foul. If the ball is still in the net on its downward flight, are you going to grant this timeout? If not, what is your rule reference for ignoring it?

Nope, a TO can't be legally granted because the ball isn't dead yet until it clears the net. And you knew that(semantics- but still important rules-wise).

Now once the ball clears the net......

Different scenarios.....

1) A TO request that was legally made should always be granted. Whether the actual TO granted was legal or not is a whole' nother matter. So no, you don't ignore a legal TO request.

2) If the team that just scored now wants to get a DOG warning charged though, then you go by the direction of casebook play 9.3.3SitD-COMMENT

Apples and oranges iow...

Note that I answered for SNAQs because I know he'd give you basically the same answer.

Adam Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CMHCoachNRef (Post 650961)
Snaqs,
Just curious. In this situation, Team A (the team I coach :)) has just made the three to pull within one. Shockingly :eek:, I failed to keep a timeout for such a situation and only have "Webers" left. But, seeing that there are under five seconds remaining, I IMMEDIATELY and LOUDLY signal for a timeout, knowing that it will result in a technical foul. If the ball is still in the net on its downward flight, are you going to grant this timeout? If not, what is your rule reference for ignoring it?

I will grant it for three reasons.

1. I'm not perceptive enough at this point to determine that the ball has not yet passed through the net, so I'll probably think it's through.
2. There is no case play or rule stating that I can ignore a timeout request that is made at the appropriate time.
3. (secondarily) The penalty for the excess timeout is sufficient that you won't benefit from this tactic. It's also the same penalty the book prescribes if you cannot ignore the violation.

Adam Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 650976)
Note that I answered for SNAQs because I know he'd give you basically the same answer.

Yep, but a bit more slowly. :)

Nevadaref Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 650465)
Rulz rules.:)
...

Jmo, Snaqs, and you know how much it hurts me to have to agree with CumquatHead.:D

http://www.runemasterstudios.com/gra...ges/orange.gif

Rich Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 650955)
How much weight has Rich lost for his tuchis to be obscure. ;)

Not enough. My partner the other night was in a pair of size 31 Sansabelts and complained he weighed 152 pounds. I'd have to give him 25 pounds and 2 inches (don't even go there) to even us out.

Rich Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 651015)

Who's block signal is this?

Welpe Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 651026)
Who's block signal is this?

LOL! I am trying so hard to contain myself right now. You're going to get me in trouble at work!

Adam Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 651015)

Only in order to complete our previous discussion and finish it off:

Shut up.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1