The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   OT: Contacting an official (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/56109-ot-contacting-official.html)

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 05:01pm

OT: Contacting an official
 
It's OT, because it's football. I'm watching the Broncos go through part of the process of pissing their playoff hopes away (won't be complete until next week), and Brandon Stokely just took exception to a no-call on what he thought was pass interference. He ran about 40 yards to confront the Back Judge.

As he walked away in disgust, he threw his arms, contacting the official's outstretched hand.

Bye-bye

BktBallRef Sun Dec 27, 2009 05:02pm

Yep, easy call, REAL stupid move.

representing Sun Dec 27, 2009 05:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646208)
It's OT, because it's football. I'm watching the Broncos go through part of the process of pissing their playoff hopes away (won't be complete until next week), and Brandon Stokely just took exception to a no-call on what he thought was pass interference. He ran about 40 yards to confront the Back Judge.

As he walked away in disgust, he threw his arms, contacting the official's outstretched hand.

Bye-bye

did he get ejected? I didn't catch that because I'm flipping through channels. Eagles fan here, but this game is a definite win and my interest isn't high enough to keep it on.

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646232)
did he get ejected? I didn't catch that because I'm flipping through channels. Eagles fan here, but this game is a definite win and my interest isn't high enough to keep it on.

Yep. He got tossed. Stupid move for a veteran player.

representing Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:23pm

My brother just told me he saw it happen in the other room. He said it didn't look like it was intentional and that it probably shouldn't have been an ejection.

I don't know though, I didn't see it but will probably see it on ESPN or Comcast SN tomorrow morning

Raymond Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646239)
My brother just told me he saw it happen in the other room. He said it didn't look like it was intentional and that it probably shouldn't have been an ejection.

I don't know though, I didn't see it but will probably see it on ESPN or Comcast SN tomorrow morning

Stokely INTENTIONALLY swung in the direction of the official.

Just like I tell my kids, don't throw rocks in the neighborhood and then say it's an accident when you break a window.

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646239)
My brother just told me he saw it happen in the other room. He said it didn't look like it was intentional and that it probably shouldn't have been an ejection.

I don't know though, I didn't see it but will probably see it on ESPN or Comcast SN tomorrow morning

Whether he hit him intentionally doesn't matter. Did he aim for him? No. Did he swing purposefully in the direction of the official's hand? Definitely. He did it in anger, and I'm pretty sure it was preceded by some choice words. My understanding is that contacting an official is a judgment-free call.

Berkut Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646242)
Whether he hit him intentionally doesn't matter. Did he aim for him? No. Did he swing purposefully in the direction of the official's hand? Definitely. He did it in anger, and I'm pretty sure it was preceded by some choice words. My understanding is that contacting an official is a judgment-free call.

Kind of has to be, doesn't it? Last thing we need is any kind of debate about whether someone "accidentally" hit an official - that just raises the possibility of getting away with taking a shot if you can pretend it was an "accident".

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 06:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Berkut (Post 646246)
Kind of has to be, doesn't it? Last thing we need is any kind of debate about whether someone "accidentally" hit an official - that just raises the possibility of getting away with taking a shot if you can pretend it was an "accident".

That's exactly right. I can't wait to hear the local sports radio guys complain about it tomorrow on my way home from work, though.

bradfordwilkins Sun Dec 27, 2009 07:26pm

Video of Brandon Stokley Ref Contact and Ejection

Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.

mbyron Sun Dec 27, 2009 07:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646249)
That's exactly right. I can't wait to hear the local sports radio guys complain about it tomorrow on my way home from work, though.

I predict that the league will use the expression "zero tolerance."

grunewar Sun Dec 27, 2009 07:55pm

And they should
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 646256)
I predict that the league will use the expression "zero tolerance."

It was just stupid.

fullor30 Sun Dec 27, 2009 08:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradfordwilkins (Post 646254)
Video of Brandon Stokley Ref Contact and Ejection

Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.


Please replay and get back to us.

Jurassic Referee Sun Dec 27, 2009 08:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradfordwilkins (Post 646254)
Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.

That one is a no-brainer in ANY league. You do NOT contact any official that way. You start letting things like that go and it's open season on officials.

APG Sun Dec 27, 2009 08:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradfordwilkins (Post 646254)
Video of Brandon Stokley Ref Contact and Ejection

Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.

You telling me if a player does this to you, you're not automatically dumping the player? This one seemed pretty cut and dry to me.

Berkut Sun Dec 27, 2009 09:12pm

Watching the replay, this is a lot more straightforward than I though. Looked to me like he intentionally slapped his hand. No brainer, on both their parts.

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 09:15pm

My wife heard me cheer when they tossed him, and asked what happened.

Me: "They just ejected one of the Broncos."

Wife: :confused: "Why are you happy?"

Me: Because he got stupid and deserved it.

Raymond Sun Dec 27, 2009 09:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradfordwilkins (Post 646254)
Video of Brandon Stokley Ref Contact and Ejection

Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.

I'll repeat my earlier reply for you:

Just like I tell my kids, don't throw rocks in the neighborhood and then say it's an accident when you break a window.

representing Sun Dec 27, 2009 09:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Berkut (Post 646246)
Kind of has to be, doesn't it? Last thing we need is any kind of debate about whether someone "accidentally" hit an official - that just raises the possibility of getting away with taking a shot if you can pretend it was an "accident".

After watching the video, I'd have to agree. Although not intentionally hitting the official, any contact against an official in any sport (except coaches in baseball apparently) should be zero tolerance. I'm sure some words he said could have influenced the ejection as well.

And before anyone says anything, I know some of you may reference back to my post last week about a player making contact with me and I didn't eject him. That was my fault and I don't need a reminder. :o

Adam Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646280)
After watching the video, I'd have to agree. Although not intentionally hitting the official, any contact against an official in any sport (except coaches in baseball apparently) should be zero tolerance. I'm sure some words he said could have influenced the ejection as well.

And before anyone says anything, I know some of you may reference back to my post last week about a player making contact with me and I didn't eject him. That was my fault and I don't need a reminder. :o

I will say there's a difference between contacting an official to show him what you think happened (a T, and perhaps a flagrant) and the OP, which was hitting an official in anger/frustration.

mbyron Mon Dec 28, 2009 08:08am

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646280)
Although not intentionally hitting the official, any contact against an official in any sport (except coaches in baseball apparently) should be zero tolerance.

Disagree. Football umpires get knocked down all the time.

A helpful distinction (though not exhaustive) would be live-ball vs. dead-ball contact.

Jurassic Referee Mon Dec 28, 2009 08:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 646358)
Disagree. Football umpires get knocked down all the time.

A helpful distinction (though not exhaustive) would be live-ball vs. dead-ball contact.

Naw, that distinction doesn't really help either imo. The distinction in any sport at any time is whether the contact was incidental/accidental or deliberate and unsporting.

constable Mon Dec 28, 2009 09:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 646358)
Disagree. Football umpires get knocked down all the time.

A helpful distinction (though not exhaustive) would be live-ball vs. dead-ball contact.

I got bumped into in the FRA the other night by a kid who was being subbed out. He was walking backwards and didn't see me. So are you guys saying that I should have tossed him?

If the contact is intentional than the player or coach is gone. It's simple.

tomegun Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by constable (Post 646365)
I got bumped into in the FRA the other night by a kid who was being subbed out. He was walking backwards and didn't see me. So are you guys saying that I should have tossed him?

If the contact is intentional than the player or coach is gone. It's simple.

I would say no. You are talking about something that happens all the time versus making contact while complaining, etc.

Upward ref Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646280)
After watching the video, I'd have to agree. Although not intentionally hitting the official, any contact against an official in any sport (except coaches in baseball apparently) should be zero tolerance. I'm sure some words he said could have influenced the ejection as well.

And before anyone says anything, I know some of you may reference back to my post last week about a player making contact with me and I didn't eject him. That was my fault and I don't need a reminder. :o

pretty clear intentional for me . The 30 yard rush with a full head of steam was already as unsportsmanlike as you can get IMO,then turn and slap the hand .i was mad just seeing it. i'm impressed with the calm , professional response and reporting as well , god call, good ref:o

constable Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradfordwilkins (Post 646254)
Video of Brandon Stokley Ref Contact and Ejection

Not sure honestly -- I don't know what he said and that alone could've been grounds for dismissal... but the contacting the official here seems a little finger to finger to me... I really don't know.

I agree what he said may have been enough to get him ejected but contacting the official is as dumb a move as you can make. Whether the contact is severe or not it doesn't matter he has to go.

Adam Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Upward ref (Post 646386)
pretty clear intentional for me . The 30 yard rush with a full head of steam was already as unsportsmanlike as you can get IMO,then turn and slap the hand .i was mad just seeing it. i'm impressed with the calm , professional response and reporting as well , god call, good ref:o

Exactly, which is why I was cheering even though it was my team getting penalized. Proof positive to me that I'm watching all these games as an official.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 646358)
Disagree. Football umpires get knocked down all the time.

A helpful distinction (though not exhaustive) would be live-ball vs. dead-ball contact.

That is true. I was meaning in a dissenting way. I got run over by a player a few weeks ago in a JH game. I'm not going to eject him because it was clearly an accident. I didn't know he was there and he didn't know I was there.

Sorry for not being clear. I meant only when a player or coach is clearly showing dissent while such contact, accidental or intentional, occurs.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by constable (Post 646365)
I got bumped into in the FRA the other night by a kid who was being subbed out. He was walking backwards and didn't see me. So are you guys saying that I should have tossed him?

If the contact is intentional than the player or coach is gone. It's simple.

That is true. The problem for referees is when it is not CLEARLY intentional and could have been accidental, which is not that simple. As someone mentioned earlier, zero tolerance policy helps so we don't have to guess if it was intentional or not.

In your case with the sub, no ejection. It happens to all of us in basketball. If you asked that after my post before yours, I apologize for not being clear.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 01:00pm

I just thought of something. Never happened to me, I've seen it done in professional and college football with the "touchdown" signal.

Shooter shoots a three and makes it. I have both of my hands up to signal a successful three point shot. Player comes over and slaps my hands as a high five touch. Technical?

Adam Mon Dec 28, 2009 01:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646419)
I just thought of something. Never happened to me, I've seen it done in professional and college football with the "touchdown" signal.

Shooter shoots a three and makes it. I have both of my hands up to signal a successful three point shot. Player comes over and slaps my hands as a high five touch. Technical?

Hmmm. Not the first time, I don't think. My first instinct on this is a very stern warning to the player not to do that in the future.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 01:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646420)
Hmmm. Not the first time, I don't think. My first instinct on this is a very stern warning to the player not to do that in the future.

hm, I would probably do the same thing. I'm not very sure. But if you did T him up, the coach would be more mad towards the player and not you, wouldn't you agree?

Mark Padgett Mon Dec 28, 2009 02:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646419)
I just thought of something. Never happened to me, I've seen it done in professional and college football with the "touchdown" signal.

Shooter shoots a three and makes it. I have both of my hands up to signal a successful three point shot. Player comes over and slaps my hands as a high five touch. Technical?

Sounds like something out of the "High Stress Ref" video. :D

j51969 Mon Dec 28, 2009 02:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646426)
hm, I would probably do the same thing. I'm not very sure. But if you did T him up, the coach would be more mad towards the player and not you, wouldn't you agree?

Your kidding right?

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 02:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646430)
Your kidding right?

not really, why?

What do we read before each game?

Sportsmanship Message:
"Actions meant to demean opposing contestants, teams, spectators, and OFFICIALS are not in the highest ideals of interscholastic education and will not be tolerated."

Coaches should know that and be mad at their own players for their stupidity. If a coach were to get mad at me, I'll just say "hey coach, you were there when I (or my partner) read the sportsmanship message before the game."

Adam Mon Dec 28, 2009 02:52pm

If you think the act was meant to demean you, then you're right. I don't see it that way, though. I see it as one of two things, most likely.

1. Taunting.
2. Emotional reaction to a big shot; and he sees a hand and thinks it's a teammate.

As the new lead, though, he'd have to chase me down to give me a high five, and by the time he reached me my hands would be down. If I'm C, maybe possible, but my hands are only up for a couple of seconds.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 03:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646449)
1. Taunting.

Taunting who? the referee or the opponent? Either way it would be unsporting.

But like you said, I would have to see how it worked out. Stern warning would suffice enough.

representing Mon Dec 28, 2009 03:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 646429)
Sounds like something out of the "High Stress Ref" video. :D

That's where i got the question. Towards the end one of the players comes up and gives a high five or ten and they do all that hand clapping routine stuff.

j51969 Mon Dec 28, 2009 03:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by representing (Post 646443)
not really, why?

What do we read before each game?

Sportsmanship Message:
"Actions meant to demean opposing contestants, teams, spectators, and OFFICIALS are not in the highest ideals of interscholastic education and will not be tolerated."

Coaches should know that and be mad at their own players for their stupidity. If a coach were to get mad at me, I'll just say "hey coach, you were there when I (or my partner) read the sportsmanship message before the game."

If you whacked a kid for giving you a high-five I don't believe the initial reaction from the coach will be to chew the player @ss. That's why I said, "Are you kidding?" I am not debating the validity of the T itself. I just can't see you not getting an ear full first.

jdw3018 Mon Dec 28, 2009 03:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646463)
If you whacked a kid for giving you a high-five I don't believe the initial reaction from the coach will be to chew the player @ss. That's why I said, "Are you kidding?" I am not debating the validity of the T itself. I just can't see you not getting an ear full first.

Just depends on who the coach is. I know my high school coach would have torn my arm off and bludgeoned me with it before the official could whack me...

BillyMac Mon Dec 28, 2009 07:38pm

I Hope I Don't Get Ejected, Or Worse, Arrested ...
 
Since the introduction of the alternating possession arrow, the following has happened to me on two occasions. I call a held ball, while my thumbs are still up in the air, I look intently at the arrow at the table, and respond by immediately bringing an arm down to point in the proper direction, hitting a player on the head.

Back In The Saddle Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 646449)
If you think the act was meant to demean you, then you're right. I don't see it that way, though. I see it as one of two things, most likely.

1. Taunting.
2. Emotional reaction to a big shot; and he sees a hand and thinks it's a teammate.

As the new lead, though, he'd have to chase me down to give me a high five, and by the time he reached me my hands would be down. If I'm C, maybe possible, but my hands are only up for a couple of seconds.

3. Player being a smart ***. That would be why I would do it. ;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1