More on "consistency"

[Raymond]

[QUOTE=truerookie;620445]

Originally Posted by zeedonk

Combined with a recent camp that had most observers (college, for most part) disfavoring most "and-1s" if the player got the shot off,


I get it!! However, I don't get the pass on the and-1s if the player got the shot off.

Doesn't that go against the rule of a airborne shooter. As long as, the player get the shot off pass on the call.

So my position is, if a shooter goes up and the defender bumps or box out the shooter before he/she returns to the floor. As long as they got the shot off pass on the call.

SOMEONE PLEASE CLEAR THIS UP FOR ME!

Distance to/from the goal should not be of any consequences.

Actually, there are times when distance does make a difference. Contact on the wrist to someone shooting a point blank lay-up is not the same as contact to the wrist of someone shooting a 18' jumper.

As far as letting airborne shooters return safely to the ground, protecting shooters was a Focus Point last year for NCAA-M. And I never heard anyone ever say that's airborne players in the paint can be knocked down without penalty.

[just another ref]

"One does not strive for consistency. One strives for quality. Consistency is one of the symptoms of quality."**




**author unknown