Hasn't it been established during discussions about Correctable Errors that the rules are not necessarily intended to be fair?

As my 8th grade science teacher drilled into us (before he was fired for drinking in class two years in a row), "Life ain't fair."

I think we're talking apples and oranges, or at least apples and crab apples. The CE rule seems to have been deliberately written to screw everybody to some degree, and thus ensure that everybody has an incentive to get it right.

Foul penalties and FT violation penalties...well, how would we make it more fair? The nature of the beast is such that there is no completely equitable way to penalize each side the same. I do think using POI all (or at least most) technical fouls would make it more equitable. Then the penalty really becomes only two free throws to the opponent and a technical, personal, and team foul recorded for the miscreant. Nobody "gets" or "doesn't get" the ball.

Perhaps if we went to POI for all fouls? For the first six per team per half, that's just putting the ball back in play. After that, the offended team shoots free throws, then the ball goes back to POI?

Nah, I don't think that would work very well at all.