The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 09:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SW Kansas
Posts: 728
It would take four years to get everyone to paint 2 small arcs on their court? Are team colors that hard to come by?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 02:30pm
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas View Post
It would take four years to get everyone to paint 2 small arcs on their court? Are team colors that hard to come by?
Good one!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 07:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Sadly, it's true.

NCAA Men's and Women's Basketball Rules Committees Announce Rules Changes, Including a Focus on Sportsmanship - NCAA.org

On the men’s rules side, the committee made two significant alterations. After discussing adding a restricted area arc at length, the committee instead decided to define the area under the basket and prohibit a secondary defender from establishing guarding position in that area. In the rules proposal, a secondary defender must establish position outside the area from the front of the rim to the front of the backboard.
“In our surveys and rules forums, the coaches wanted the committee to address the increasing contact that seems to occur under the basket,” said Ed Bilik, secretary-editor of the men’s committee. “Instead of an experimental rule, this clarifies how officials are to call this play throughout the season.”
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 08:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 346
NCAA is becoming NBA, Jr. I hate this.... NBA bores me to tears, and I love NCAA...for now. Sad.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 10:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
There are two huge problems with this.

1. They wish the officals to call it that way, but don't give them an indicator on the floor such as the arc that the NBA has. Very poor idea.

2. This is a 180 degree reversal in the NCAA policy. Just last season they stated how charges must be called in the area under the basket.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 07, 2009, 11:42pm
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
There are two huge problems with this.

1. They wish the officals to call it that way, but don't give them an indicator on the floor such as the arc that the NBA has. Very poor idea.

2. This is a 180 degree reversal in the NCAA policy. Just last season they stated how charges must be called in the area under the basket.
You are correct, but this is consistent with the NCAA being inconsistent. I know it would piss a lot of people off and cost them money, but NCAA officiating will never be what it could as long as things like this happen to make things more inconsistent than they already are. Sure, there will always be differences because officials are different, but when you do things like this it makes it worse. A play in Seattle should be officiated the same way it is in Chapel Hill (gasp), Memphis, Dallas, etc.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 08, 2009, 12:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomegun View Post
You are correct, but this is consistent with the NCAA being inconsistent. I know it would piss a lot of people off and cost them money, but NCAA officiating will never be what it could as long as things like this happen to make things more inconsistent than they already are. Sure, there will always be differences because officials are different, but when you do things like this it makes it worse. A play in Seattle should be officiated the same way it is in Chapel Hill (gasp), Memphis, Dallas, etc.
So you are saying that every level of officiating is inconsistent and that all refs suck?? Should we just show you to the fanboy website?? Are you even one of us anymore or am I just reading your posts incorrectly? I would like to say im just kidding but you seem to be really negative to the avocation in the last posts i've seen.
__________________
"players must decide the outcome of the game with legal actions, not illegal actions which an official chooses to ignore."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 08, 2009, 06:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
There are two huge problems with this.

2. This is a 180 degree reversal in the NCAA policy. Just last season they stated how charges must be called in the area under the basket.
Regarding point 2, I think that this is not so much the NCAA being inconsistent but simply a lack of foresight. They made a point of telling officials to call more charges under the basket. This gave the defense a significant advantage, especially at bigger-program schools with the bigger, quicker defenders.

Now the committee aims to neutralize this advantage with a no-charge zone, because defense is boring. And they fail to foresee the problems with that idea (but only expect to live with them, since pro ball has them too).

Think your school can score 100 in 40 minutes?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 08, 2009, 08:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: kansas
Posts: 155
I just want to go on record, "This is a bad idea!"

I predict there will be a retreat on this in the very near future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Approved bats surehands Softball 10 Mon Apr 06, 2009 09:46am
New ASA non-approved bat list NCASAUmp Softball 4 Mon May 07, 2007 10:20pm
approved bats justmom Softball 13 Tue Apr 25, 2006 08:35pm
no-charge zone eck Basketball 8 Mon Jun 20, 2005 04:55pm
Non ASA Approved Bats Dukat Softball 0 Tue Jun 01, 2004 03:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1