The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   The odds of making it to D1 (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/5327-odds-making-d1.html)

stripes Wed Jul 03, 2002 10:23am

I was at a camp recently and some interesting statistics were given. The NCAA takes roll at the D1 rules clinics that are held around the country. Currently, there are approximately 1,200 referees who work D1 basketball (about 600 who do men's games and 600 who do women's games). Obviously, these spots do not turn over every year, so one can deduce the difficulty of ever making the D1 ranks.

I didn't write this to discourage anyone who holds the same dream of working D1 that I do. I just think that we need to know what we are up against.

BTW, the information came from a conference coordinator of officials.

Dennis Flannery Wed Jul 03, 2002 12:03pm

What camp were you at?

BktBallRef Wed Jul 03, 2002 12:24pm

I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


JRutledge Wed Jul 03, 2002 03:00pm

You make me laugh Tony.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


To quote Johnny Gill, "There you go!!!"


Peace

JRutledge Wed Jul 03, 2002 03:07pm

Might be harder than a player.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by stripes
I was at a camp recently and some interesting statistics were given. The NCAA takes roll at the D1 rules clinics that are held around the country. Currently, there are approximately 1,200 referees who work D1 basketball (about 600 who do men's games and 600 who do women's games). Obviously, these spots do not turn over every year, so one can deduce the difficulty of ever making the D1 ranks.

I didn't write this to discourage anyone who holds the same dream of working D1 that I do. I just think that we need to know what we are up against.

BTW, the information came from a conference coordinator of officials.

I think the numbers are even lower for officials to make it to the college ranks, as it is for a player to make it to the NBA ranks. Not everyone is talented, and you have to be that before you can even think of achieving such a task.

Peace

stripes Wed Jul 03, 2002 04:30pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Dennis Flannery
What camp were you at?
The Big Sky camp.

BTW tony, I do know some who have made it to D1 in 5 years--on the men's side. Definitely the exception rather than the rule. :cool:

JRutledge Wed Jul 03, 2002 04:44pm

It happens and is the exception.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by stripes
Quote:

Originally posted by Dennis Flannery
What camp were you at?
The Big Sky camp.

BTW tony, I do know some who have made it to D1 in 5 years--on the men's side. Definitely the exception rather than the rule. :cool:

And I know of officials that have made it in 5 years on the Women's side. I even know of someone that made it to the NBA in 5 or 6 years. Definitely the exception, but it has happen.

Peace

Doug Wed Jul 03, 2002 06:38pm

well, a rule isn't a rule without an exception:)

Dan_ref Wed Jul 03, 2002 08:39pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


Yeah, but you gotta be in Chicagoland, apparently they
are REALLY desperate for refs (if you believe some people).

JRutledge Wed Jul 03, 2002 10:43pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


Yeah, but you gotta be in Chicagoland, apparently they
are REALLY desperate for refs (if you believe some people).

Well whether it be Chicago area or the rest of the state, the people here must be doing something right. We always seem to have officials in all sports at the highest levels. How many pro and D1 college officials are in your area?

That is what I thought.

Peace

Dan_ref Wed Jul 03, 2002 10:52pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


Yeah, but you gotta be in Chicagoland, apparently they
are REALLY desperate for refs (if you believe some people).

Well whether it be Chicago area or the rest of the state, the people here must be doing something right. We always seem to have officials in all sports at the highest levels. How many pro and D1 college officials are in your area?

That is what I thought.

Peace

NYC? I have no idea, but I'll guess a lot.

JRutledge Wed Jul 03, 2002 11:07pm

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:


NYC? I have no idea, but I'll guess a lot.
Don't guess, look it up. Referee Magazine posts every professional official in the Major League sports and the not so major sports.

Peace

ChuckElias Thu Jul 04, 2002 11:33am

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Do your own research. @sshole.
You seem grumpy over the last couple posts. Heat wave gettin' to ya, Dan? LOL :D

crew Thu Jul 04, 2002 11:52am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


its not magic, its hard work and determination and ability.

rainmaker Thu Jul 04, 2002 11:57am

Quote:

Originally posted by crew
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


its not magic, its hard work and determination and ability.

And being female. Don't forget the statistics are much better for females (which is my only hope!).

ChuckElias Thu Jul 04, 2002 12:59pm

Quote:

Originally posted by crew
its not magic, its hard work and determination and ability.
Hi ya tony. Good to see you again. I'll agree that it takes those things, but you need something more too. Either connections, or luck, or something. Because there are a lot of guys who work hard, have determination and ability (I'm among them, I think) who can't get a sniff of D1. I totally agree with what you wrote, but I think we need to be honest and say that sometimes (usually, in fact) those things aren't enough. You need a break. The right person has to see you in the right place and at the right time. Do you think that's a fair statement?

On a personal note, how are you holding up in the heat? It must be like an oven down there? What kind of ball have you been working this summer? Camps? You can email, if you don't want to respond on the board. Just wanted to catch up a little. Also, do you have your college schedule for the Fall yet? I'd love to know how that goes. Take care.

Chuck

crew Thu Jul 04, 2002 02:21pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:

Originally posted by crew
its not magic, its hard work and determination and ability.
I'll agree that it takes those things, but you need something more too. Either connections, or luck, or something. Because there are a lot of guys who work hard, have determination and ability (I'm among them, I think) who can't get a sniff of D1. I totally agree with what you wrote, but I think we need to be honest and say that sometimes (usually, in fact) those things aren't enough. You need a break. The right person has to see you in the right place and at the right time. Do you think that's a fair statement?
Chuck

trying to move up the ranks is difficult. for some quicker than others. the first key to going to the next level is self evaluation. (this is straight from joe borgia-director of referee developement for the nba)
1. am i athletic
2. do i have solid clear mechanics

the next key to moving up is in camps, quality camps. when an official looks for a camp look at
1. is this a learning camp(not a meat market where all you do is work 2 games a day without classroom instrucution).
2. who is sponsoring the camp.
3. who is instructing/critiqueing the camp.
4. are there supervisors observing/evaluating officials.

when attending camps run hard every time down the court, KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT, and when a critiquer says something you think is wrong, say this, "yes sir, i will do that." and when you are on his court do it. the guys that are hired to critique are there to see how well you listen to instruction. he is not going to go to the supervisor and say "he works the trail to far from the basket you shouldnt hire him." he is however going to say, "i told him to work closer ot he basket at trail and he did it, i only had to tell him once" or "i told him to work closer to the basket and he argued with me." now which is more likely to please a supewrvisor?

what i am getting at in this lengthy post is that everyone has the ability to create their own opportunity. for me i did not wait for the supervisors to come to the one caution light town of Grand Ridge Fl. to find me. i put myself into their line of vision and hoped that i had learned the qualities they were seeking.

WestCoastRef Thu Jul 04, 2002 03:52pm

huh?!
 
Who said the statistics are better if you are female?? I know a great many FEMALE officials who are not getting hired in D-1 Conferences. It is very competitive out there, even if you are female. And if you are female you'd better be able to do more than walk and chew gum.

ChuckElias Thu Jul 04, 2002 04:59pm

I think that almost anyone will tell you that you have a better chance of getting to D1 if you are a female. Of course you know many women who aren't at the D1 level. I also know many men who aren't in Congress. Does that mean that my chances for election are any better or worse than those of a woman candidate? No. That doesn't prove anything. But I think it's fairly well-known that D1 Women's assignors want to hire female officials. That means a good female official has a better chance of landing that D1 spot than a good male official, all other things being equal.

Chuck

ChuckElias Thu Jul 04, 2002 05:02pm

Quote:

Originally posted by crew
the next key to moving up is in camps, quality camps. when an official looks for a camp look at
1. is this a learning camp(not a meat market where all you do is work 2 games a day without classroom instrucution).
2. who is sponsoring the camp.
3. who is instructing/critiqueing the camp.
4. are there supervisors observing/evaluating officials.

I think we're agreeing here, tony. Being good is a necessary first step. But you also have to be seen by the right people at the right time. You do this by choosing the right camp(s) to attend; which you've done successfully, and I have not :(

Chuck

rainmaker Thu Jul 04, 2002 09:28pm

Re: huh?!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by WestCoastRef
Who said the statistics are better if you are female?? I know a great many FEMALE officials who are not getting hired in D-1 Conferences. It is very competitive out there, even if you are female. And if you are female you'd better be able to do more than walk and chew gum.
I'm quoting here, I have not had any experience in this area at all, but, what I've been told is that in women's, the chances of moving up are better for female refs. What I've been told is that any female ref who has the necessary qualities can move up to D-1. There simply aren't enough. We're talking about women's ball here. Of course, for an individual, this means getting qualified. Just being female isn't enough on its own, but for men the competition is much more fierce. Many, many male refs who are highly qualified will not move up, but there aren't enough women who can do the job, so anyone who can, may.

BigDave Fri Jul 05, 2002 12:24am

Quote:

Originally posted by stripes
Quote:

Originally posted by Dennis Flannery
What camp were you at?
The Big Sky camp.

BTW tony, I do know some who have made it to D1 in 5 years--on the men's side. Definitely the exception rather than the rule. :cool:

Who were the evaluators besides Marla? I'm good friends with C. Rastatter and B. Schofield. They're here in Tucson.

stripes Fri Jul 05, 2002 12:30pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BigDave
Who were the evaluators besides Marla? I'm good friends with C. Rastatter and B. Schofield. They're here in Tucson.
Sco and Ras were both there. Others included Ray DalPogetto, Herb Dillion, Pete Waylett, John Weeks, Ruben Ramos, Bob McAllister, Brian Mikkelson, Gordon Overstreet and Verne Harris. I think that is everyone. Very good instruction.

Tim Roden Fri Jul 05, 2002 02:15pm

From what I was told there is an element of luck in making d1. Where you live, your gender, the need for officials. A lot of officials there now came in when NCAA went from 2 man to three man mechanics. There is currently a need for female officials in Womans basketball. So Woman will move up faster. There is always attrician due to retirement, and coaches no longer wanting to see certain officials and plain old fashion quitting. So good officials will always have a spot. But it is only the top 5% that even have a chance. I know a good official that didn't make it. I don't know why but he moved to Dallas so he would have a better chance next time.

Jeremy Hohn Fri Jul 05, 2002 10:41pm

..slim and none without help...or the right profile....
 
Well I just got done talking to a buddy of mine that went to the Big 12 mens camp and he said he payed $600 for 6 20 minute halves. They only picked up one guy and it was apparent that the slot was already filled. Good investment? You tell me.....

crew Sat Jul 06, 2002 01:45am

another thing is to not go to camps that are over your head or ability. take it easy, be patient and good things will come to good people. (im not saying your freind isnt good enough i am making a general statement)

Ref42 Sat Jul 06, 2002 10:00am

D1
 
Just as a side note, was just at a camp with Ted Valentine as a speaker. He commented that there are about 1450 D1 Officials and during the season about 15% of the 1400 or so do 85% of the games. With this in mind, it tells you that once you have made it to D1 it doesn't guarantee you will work that many games. So just because a D1 supervisor puts on you on staff doesn't mean your'e working all the time or any time.

Now back to the original subject. I agree there is something true in everyone's posts, but lets be serious, there is so much more that goes into selection of someone than just referee skills and this goes for the D2 and D3. Many of these things you also can do nothing about immediately. I believe things like your

1. Looks - Todays D1 Mens officials are proto-typed. If you are 6'2"-6'6" with a good physique and run well you are one step ahead of the game. I'm sorry I know this for fact and saw a perfect example at a D1 camp this year. Now this is not to say the other guy won't get a look but the above gives you the edge over someone of the same referee caliber.

2 Where you live - Depending on what specific conference you are trying out for will always help determine if you will be picked up. If a supervisor can call you at a moments notice and you are in the range of skills of which he requires then you also have the edge over the next guy and sometimes the next guy may be better, but where he lives doesn't provide the supervisor the same oppurtunities.

3. What kind of job do you have - AVAILABILITY! Will always put you in a different category if you have the ability to referee. So officials who are self-employed, are salesman, or company exec's which control their own schedule are some examples of the official who may have the edge.


crew Sat Jul 06, 2002 10:30am

this is absolutely correct!

BktBallRef Sat Jul 06, 2002 11:42am

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


To quote Johnny Gill, "There you go!!!"

There you go, Rutledge.

Everytime I make a remark about someone saying something stupid, you think I'm talking about you! :D

The comments posted in this thread would seem to correctly indicate that it is very difficult to move up into the D1 level. But you porbably wouldn't agree, so tell us how easy it is. :)

stripes, making D1 with less than 10 years experience is certainly the exception, not the rule. One example is Joe DeRosa. Joe worked high school varsity ball for 3 years before moving to D1. He worked D1 for only 3 years before getting picked up by the NBA. He's been in the NBA for about 15 years now and is one of the top 15 officials in the league. But I can't tell you if or how long he worked in lower levels before working HS varisty

JRutledge Sat Jul 06, 2002 01:02pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I dunno stripes. To hear some people talk, it's not that hard. You start out working high school games your first year and, magically, you're in D1 in 4 or 5 years! :rolleyes:


To quote Johnny Gill, "There you go!!!"

There you go, Rutledge.

Everytime I make a remark about someone saying something stupid, you think I'm talking about you! :D


Tony,

You made a statement that not a single person made. You mischaracterized the comments of others (and if that includes myself, so be it) and you accused people of saying it was easy by simply giving an example or examples of people that have achieved that level. Whether it was me or anyone, you were wrong in your statements. I never heard <b>anyone</b> say it was easy. But you did lump in the HS comment and not a sole claimed that you just jumped from HS to college without any work or talent. Again that was a mischaracterization of what everyone was saying.

I think it is time for you to admit you were wrong. But that is just me. Then again, that is why this place is funny, you take me much more seriously than I take myself.

Peace

BktBallRef Sun Jul 07, 2002 06:44pm

My comment was neither correct or incorrect, right or wrong. It was simply sarcasm. Note the :rolleyes: at the end of the post.

JRutledge Sun Jul 07, 2002 09:54pm

That is interesting.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
My comment was neither correct or incorrect, right or wrong. It was simply sarcasm. Note the :rolleyes: at the end of the post.
You do not like it when others bring you to task, but when you do it is alright. I see standard for you do not apply to everyone else. :rolleyes:

Peace

BktBallRef Sun Jul 07, 2002 10:07pm

Re: That is interesting.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
My comment was neither correct or incorrect, right or wrong. It was simply sarcasm. Note the :rolleyes: at the end of the post.
You do not like it when others bring you to task, but when you do it is alright. I see standard for you do not apply to everyone else. :rolleyes:

Peace

You know, it would be great if you could use correct English. "I see standard for you do not apply to everyone else." What the h*ll does that mean? :(

You bring no one to task. I made a sarcastic remark based on comments that you previously made. Period. I'm certainly not the first poster here to do that. I'm sorry if you can't understand the concept of sarcasm.

Ignore me and get on with your life.

JRutledge Sun Jul 07, 2002 10:19pm

LOL!!!!!!!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
My comment was neither correct or incorrect, right or wrong. It was simply sarcasm. Note the :rolleyes: at the end of the post.
You do not like it when others bring you to task, but when you do it is alright. I see standard for you do not apply to everyone else. :rolleyes:

Peace

You know, it would be great if you could use correct English. "I see standard for you do not apply to everyone else." What the h*ll does that mean? :(

You bring no one to task. I made a sarcastic remark based on comments that you previously made. Period. I'm certainly not the first poster here to do that. I'm sorry if you can't understand the concept of sarcasm.

Ignore me and get on with your life.

You crack me up Tony. ;) Cannot take your own medicine can you.

I have been telling you to ignore me for along time and you never do. You seem to always find something to say to me, and you are almost never in on any of my conversations on this board.

Do you want a hanky Tony? Did I strike a nerve?

Peace

Mark Padgett Mon Jul 08, 2002 12:11am

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
and not a sole claimed.....
.

Even though they have tongues, shoes don't speak. ;)

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
you take me much more seriously than I take myself.
I don't. ;)

rockyroad Mon Jul 08, 2002 12:28am


Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
you take me much more seriously than I take myself.

Nobody does anymore...

JRutledge Mon Jul 08, 2002 07:45am

I just find it fascinating
 
Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
you take me much more seriously than I take myself.

Nobody does anymore...

You shouldn't have in the first place. :rolleyes: But that shows where everyone's head is at if they take anyone seriously when they do not know them. ;)

Peace


BktBallRef Mon Jul 08, 2002 01:17pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
You seem to always find something to say to me, and you are almost never in on any of my conversations on this board.
Sure I am. I'm there every time you write something goofy, responding with the correct answer. That's why I have more posts than anyone else on the board, because I'm always correcting something you screw up! :D

I take you seriously because of all the misinformation that you spread. There are a lot of officials on this board who are trying to learn. When you spout off some ridiculous answer to a question, somebody has to let them know that you don't know what you're talking about. Such is my lot in life. :(

JRutledge Tue Jul 09, 2002 09:04am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
You seem to always find something to say to me, and you are almost never in on any of my conversations on this board.
Sure I am. I'm there every time you write something goofy, responding with the correct answer. That's why I have more posts than anyone else on the board, because I'm always correcting something you screw up! :D

I take you seriously because of all the misinformation that you spread. There are a lot of officials on this board who are trying to learn. When you spout off some ridiculous answer to a question, somebody has to let them know that you don't know what you're talking about. Such is my lot in life. :(

Sure Tony, like most start out at rec. level. Several officials have said they did not start officiating at the rec. level and middle school levels, but you still go around telling the world that is the only way to start officiating. And if you look at most states, that does not apply either. Maybe it does in North Carolina, but we all do not all officiate in Tobacco Road. Much of what I say would not even apply to your area. And if I do not know what I am talking about, then all the D1, NBA, NFL, Arena Football League and many Pro-Am, Semi-Pro officials do not know what they are talking about either. We here are crawling with those officials all over the area. Does that apply where you live?

Peace

jbduke Tue Jul 09, 2002 10:59am

Tony,

His English is fine. It's his grammar that stinks.:)

devdog69 Tue Jul 09, 2002 11:26am

No, I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to say: a rule book is to officiating as a grammar book is to life. Some think they are essential to each other, others think they are seperable. I'm just not going to go there.

JRutledge Tue Jul 09, 2002 11:42am

This is why................
 
most officials I know personally, never come to officiating discussion boards. People are much more worried about things that may or may not apply to them, then worrying about things that only affect them.

Worry about my English, Grammar or my typing all day. I will still have the same schedule I had before I said anything and so will you.

Have a great summer.

Peace

Jurassic Referee Tue Jul 09, 2002 01:00pm

Re: This is why................
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
People are much more worried about things that may or may not apply to them, then worrying about things that only affect them.
This may be the ultimate Rutism!! :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1