The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Giving the fumble signal (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/52559-giving-fumble-signal.html)

Indianaref Sat Mar 28, 2009 08:13am

Giving the fumble signal
 
Had a disagreement with another official on a play that happened earlier this year. It was on my mind yesterday, so I thought I would ask it here.

A1 is dribbling in her front court, ends her dribble, then fumbles the ball about 10 feet away. She starts out to retrieve the ball, then stops short of the ball believing that her next touch will be a violation. With the defense closing in, she decides to go ahead and pick up the ball. Of course, no whistle, the coach of Team B immediately complains, I give the fumble signal (I know that the fumble signal is not a proper NFHS mechanic, but I use it anyway). Later my P says that I should go ahead and give the fumble signal early (before she picks up the ball) so that everyone will know that you are on top of it, sort of like when an official gives the tip signal early when the ball goes into the back court.

My thoughts are to wait and let the play develop then give a signal after the ball is retrieved. To me it looks like you are not trying to coach the team.

mbyron Sat Mar 28, 2009 08:25am

In that kind of situation, I wouldn't worry too much about being accused of "coaching." You're not telling the players what to do, you're reporting the status of the ball. In this regard, signalling "fumble" is in fact like signalling a tip on a potential BC violation.

I'm sort of curious what your "fumble" signal is. Is it like the "bobble" signal umpires use at 1B?

Indianaref Sat Mar 28, 2009 08:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 592112)
I'm sort of curious what your "fumble" signal is. Is it like the "bobble" signal umpires use at 1B?

Not a baseball guy, but I believe it is the same. Two hands in front of body, palms facing skyward, alternating up and down. Sort of like holding Dolly Parton's.....well never mind.

JugglingReferee Sat Mar 28, 2009 09:34am

This is also the bobble signal that officials use in the NFL.

grunewar Sat Mar 28, 2009 02:40pm

Just curious
 
Is the "fumble" signal similar to the "hit to the head" signal in that it elaborates on what happened, is easily understood, and yet everyone knows it's not an approved/authorized signal?

amusedofficial Sun Mar 29, 2009 07:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 592112)
Isignalling a tip on a potential BC violation.
?

Whoa. Say, under NF rules, A has PC in front court. Ball passed, B1 tips to backcourt. Do you signal? Isn't it BC violation if caught in backcourt on fly but not if caught after bounce? What if U1 has been calling tips but R and U2 have not? Does one team get an advantage by being warned of tip? If you signal tip for backcourt, why not signal tip for OOB?

Deviation from approved mechanics is a prescription for disaster. By definition, using non-approved mechanics during play leads to inconsistency. There is absolutely nothing to gain, in terms of calling game, by signaling a no-call.

Old_School Sun Mar 29, 2009 07:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 592294)
Whoa. Say, under NF rules, A has PC in front court. Ball passed, B1 tips to backcourt. Do you signal? Isn't it BC violation if caught in backcourt on fly but not if caught after bounce? What if U1 has been calling tips but R and U2 have not? Does one team get an advantage by being warned of tip? If you signal tip for backcourt, why not signal tip for OOB?

Deviation from approved mechanics is a prescription for disaster. By definition, using non-approved mechanics during play leads to inconsistency. There is absolutely nothing to gain, in terms of calling game, by signaling a no-call.

Nonsense.

You're not signalling a no-call. You're signalling who touched the ball last in the front court. There's nothing the matter with conveying that information to your partner(s) to ensure that the proper and appropriate call is subsequently made.

And yes, you can also signal the same information for out of bounds calls, both as the calling official and to assist the calling official.

It's just another tool that competent, experienced officials use when deemed necessary.

The competence of an official is measured by the accuracy of their calls. Mechanics are supposed to aid that accuracy, not hinder it.

bob jenkins Sun Mar 29, 2009 08:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 592294)
Whoa. Say, under NF rules, A has PC in front court. Ball passed, B1 tips to backcourt. Do you signal? Isn't it BC violation if caught in backcourt on fly but not if caught after bounce? What if U1 has been calling tips but R and U2 have not? Does one team get an advantage by being warned of tip? If you signal tip for backcourt, why not signal tip for OOB?

Yes, I signal if I'c C (or L in 2-person) and the tip was in my area. It lets my partner know NOT to blow the whistle for the violation, since there wasn't one. If he sees something else that makes it a violation (e.g., A1 catching the ball on the fly, if we "believe" the interp), then he can still blow the whistle.

Indianaref Sun Mar 29, 2009 09:32am

About a month or so ago, I believe it was a Big Ten game where the trail official signaled a tip into the backcourt, no call, then the center official tableside (Jim Burr) busts in and calls a back court violation. Jim Burr gives angry coach quick explanation. That had to be an interesting post game talk.

Rich Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by amusedofficial (Post 592294)
Whoa. Say, under NF rules, A has PC in front court. Ball passed, B1 tips to backcourt. Do you signal? Isn't it BC violation if caught in backcourt on fly but not if caught after bounce? What if U1 has been calling tips but R and U2 have not? Does one team get an advantage by being warned of tip? If you signal tip for backcourt, why not signal tip for OOB?

Deviation from approved mechanics is a prescription for disaster. By definition, using non-approved mechanics during play leads to inconsistency. There is absolutely nothing to gain, in terms of calling game, by signaling a no-call.

Since I don't believe that interpretation, there's really no danger here.

And in general, I'd say "Lighten up, Francis." A quick signal to alert a partner doesn't equate with the end of the world.

Stat-Man Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 592158)
Is the "fumble" signal similar to the "hit to the head" signal in that it elaborates on what happened, is easily understood, and yet everyone knows it's not an approved/authorized signal?

Isn't the hit to the head signal a valid signal in NCAA-W now?

JRutledge Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stat-Man (Post 593145)
Isn't the hit to the head signal a valid signal in NCAA-W now?

Yes.

Peace

26 Year Gap Wed Apr 01, 2009 09:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 592112)
In that kind of situation, I wouldn't worry too much about being accused of "coaching." You're not telling the players what to do, you're reporting the status of the ball. In this regard, signalling "fumble" is in fact like signalling a tip on a potential BC violation.

I'm sort of curious what your "fumble" signal is. Is it like the "bobble" signal umpires use at 1B?

I could envision JugglingReferee using this mechanic.

Adam Wed Apr 01, 2009 09:38am

Interesting, I might give the tip signal if I'm the C and it came from my area, but if I'm T on this play and it's in my area the whole time, I don't signal tip.

BillyMac Wed Apr 01, 2009 04:28pm

Me Too ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap (Post 593203)
I could envision JugglingReferee using this mechanic.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3476/...c04db826_m.jpg


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1