![]() |
Giving the fumble signal
Had a disagreement with another official on a play that happened earlier this year. It was on my mind yesterday, so I thought I would ask it here.
A1 is dribbling in her front court, ends her dribble, then fumbles the ball about 10 feet away. She starts out to retrieve the ball, then stops short of the ball believing that her next touch will be a violation. With the defense closing in, she decides to go ahead and pick up the ball. Of course, no whistle, the coach of Team B immediately complains, I give the fumble signal (I know that the fumble signal is not a proper NFHS mechanic, but I use it anyway). Later my P says that I should go ahead and give the fumble signal early (before she picks up the ball) so that everyone will know that you are on top of it, sort of like when an official gives the tip signal early when the ball goes into the back court. My thoughts are to wait and let the play develop then give a signal after the ball is retrieved. To me it looks like you are not trying to coach the team. |
In that kind of situation, I wouldn't worry too much about being accused of "coaching." You're not telling the players what to do, you're reporting the status of the ball. In this regard, signalling "fumble" is in fact like signalling a tip on a potential BC violation.
I'm sort of curious what your "fumble" signal is. Is it like the "bobble" signal umpires use at 1B? |
Quote:
|
This is also the bobble signal that officials use in the NFL.
|
Just curious
Is the "fumble" signal similar to the "hit to the head" signal in that it elaborates on what happened, is easily understood, and yet everyone knows it's not an approved/authorized signal?
|
Quote:
Deviation from approved mechanics is a prescription for disaster. By definition, using non-approved mechanics during play leads to inconsistency. There is absolutely nothing to gain, in terms of calling game, by signaling a no-call. |
Quote:
You're not signalling a no-call. You're signalling who touched the ball last in the front court. There's nothing the matter with conveying that information to your partner(s) to ensure that the proper and appropriate call is subsequently made. And yes, you can also signal the same information for out of bounds calls, both as the calling official and to assist the calling official. It's just another tool that competent, experienced officials use when deemed necessary. The competence of an official is measured by the accuracy of their calls. Mechanics are supposed to aid that accuracy, not hinder it. |
Quote:
|
About a month or so ago, I believe it was a Big Ten game where the trail official signaled a tip into the backcourt, no call, then the center official tableside (Jim Burr) busts in and calls a back court violation. Jim Burr gives angry coach quick explanation. That had to be an interesting post game talk.
|
Quote:
And in general, I'd say "Lighten up, Francis." A quick signal to alert a partner doesn't equate with the end of the world. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Interesting, I might give the tip signal if I'm the C and it came from my area, but if I'm T on this play and it's in my area the whole time, I don't signal tip.
|
Me Too ...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21am. |