![]() |
why is it when "we" officials work a great game
this topic is from a forum in minnesota....some of the comments are, in my opinion, just plain stupid...but make for entertaining reading. I'm interested to see if any of you have opinions about them.
copy and paste this into your address bar... Minnesota-Scores.net Forum • View topic - Why is it when "We" officials work a great game... |
Quote:
or just click it. |
There is a reference in the thread about officials having a bias against private schools. From my perspective, it is more like private schools have a bias against officials.
|
I'll tell you what, if an official is officiating for glory and recognition, he's in the wrong business, plain and simple.
Of course it's nice to hear compliments, and they come every once in awhile, and usually from the winning team. Sometimes they catch me so off guard, I can't even muster a "thank you". They say that you know a game is well-officiated when you seemingly don't even notice the refs are there. The game has a certain rhythm to it, and the refs are part of that rhythm. If the rhythm is disrupted, that's when people start complaining about the officiating. I know when I've called a good game, and that's all I need. I could care less what the players think. I take pride in getting better as an official. |
I'm working a few days of the home school national tournament like SWMOzebra posted last week. I did three 16U boys games on Tuesday. After all three games, players from both teams came up to us and shook our hands, thanked us for working their game, etc. Coaches were really good, fans really good for the most part. Not all experiences are bad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
The game of basketball has a rhythm unlike any other game. Baseball is slow, football is too choppy, but basketball has rhythm and flow. What's so wrong about my comments
|
Quote:
"They say that you know a game is well-officiated when you seemingly don't even notice the refs are there." That is just wrong. Many times the officials must take actions which will make them be noticed. That thought is just a myth spread by fanboys. "The game has a certain rhythm to it, and the refs are part of that rhythm. If the rhythm is disrupted, that's when people start complaining about the officiating." Quote:
I'm not even sure what the rhythm of a game even means. But I think you are talking about officials sounding their whistles many times and stopping play. Some games have lots of fouls and/or violations; in order for the game to be officiated properly the officials will have to break the rhythm many times. Stop worrying about noticing officials. Many times they will have to do things which will make them be noticed. Stop worrying about rhythm of the game. If there is a foul then call it. If there is a violation then call it. |
Quote:
The fact of the matter is, if the refs do a good job, then the game will have a much better flow and rhythm. |
Quote:
BTW, Football can constantly move if you have the right teams running the ball and keeping the ball in bounds. Baseball can go very fast if everyone is swinging a pitches or the pitcher is throwing strikes. There are no absolutes in sports and this is why your comments do not show knowledge whom ever they come from. ;) Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
BTW, Football can constantly move if you have the right teams running the ball and keeping the ball in bounds. Baseball can go very fast if everyone is swinging a pitches or the pitcher is throwing strikes. There are no absolutes in sports and this is why your comments do not show knowledge whom ever they come from. ;)
Peace[/QUOTE] If, if, if, if. Look I'm not saying you're wrong, what I'm arguing is that basketball is a more definite flow. There's always exceptions to every rule. We're getting away from the original point of the article though. Officials shouldn't be looking for glory. |
Quote:
Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47am. |